CHAPTER V
Transportation
BY WILLIAM J. BACKES
I. River Navigation
IT IS obvious that the growth of any
community is inextricably bound up with the growth of its means of transportation.
Natural waterways, ferries, bridges, roads, canals, railways - all enter
as vital factors into the expansion of a community from a village into
a modern industrial center. Trenton’s rise among the cities of
New Jersey provides but one more proof of this fundamental economic
principle.
The great natural highway of commerce
and travel in this section is, of course, the Delaware River. When New
Jersey and Pennsylvania were unopened territory, wholly in the control
of the Indians, the sole means of travel on the river was the canoe.
Later came the bateau, a flat-bottomed boat tapering at the ends, in
which it was possible to carry heavier and more bulky loads than in
light birch-bark canoes. These boats lent themselves to short, quick
water hauls, but they were quite ineffective on long trips or in river
traffic above the Falls, where the problem of the rapids had to be met.
The Delaware has never especially favored
transportation over its course. Between Easton and the head of the tidewater
at Trenton there are no less than twenty-five rapids or falls, the head
of the rapids at Bixler’s Rift (the first of the rapids) being
160 feet above low tide at Trenton. Those who travelled the river in
the 1800’s found it difficult to follow the channel not only above
the Falls, but below Trenton as well. From Trenton down, the river was
dotted with islands, shoals and mud flats; a detritus deposit of many
centuries made the channel a treacherous one.
GREAT FLOODS
ON THE DELAWARE
It was due to the presence of this
accumulation of silt that the Delaware often froze during the winter
and choked the channel with ice, making any sort of navigation impossible.
There were, too, the freshets, which now and again swept down the Delaware,
leaving ruin in their wake. The earliest recorded freshet at the Falls
was the “great land flood and rupture” of May 29, 1687,
which brought about the separation of Vurhultsen’s (Delaware Works)
Island from the Pennsylvania mainland at Morrisville. Five years later,
on February 27, occurred “the great flood at Delaware falls,”
which suddenly descended upon the many Indian families settled in the
lowland along the Delaware in this section, sweeping men, homes and
cattle away. Between 1692 and the terrible river flood of October 10,
1903, there were 43 freshets in the Delaware, the more disastrous ones
occurring on January 8, 1841, and June 6, 1862. These freshets - and
now we speak of abnormal rises in the river - came at no particular
season of the year. At times we find a series of them occurring yearly
over a long period. They made river travel a hazardous thing, and swept
away many of the boats, wharves, and other river-front property.
EARLY WATER TRAFFIC
Of the larger craft commonly used in
river traffic in the eighteenth century, the wind-propelled vessel was
probably the first to appear on the Delaware. The first ship to come
some distance up the Delaware was the Shield, which brought Mahlon
Stacy, Thomas Lambert, Thomas Potts and others from Hull, England, to
Burlington, on December 10, 1678. Most of the larger sail-rigged ships
followed the example of the Shield and ventured up the river
only as far as Burlington, fearing the shallows in the channel beyond.
The few that did come up to Trenton were probably of smaller draught.
The shallop and the sloop made the reputation of
Lamberton and Bloomsbury (earlier known as Kingsbury) as ports. We find
these small sailing vessels on the Delaware in the early days of navigation
on that river. The Swedish traveller, Kalm, mentions the “Trenton
yachts” in his account of his trip here (1748). The inhabitants
of this section, petitioning George II for a corporate charter back
in 1746, set out the favorable location of Trenton and stressed the
fact that it was at the head of sloop navigation. Located between New
York and Philadelphia, at the head of the tide on the Delaware, close
to the iron, timber and coal fields of north Jersey, and surrounded
by fertile countryside, Trenton enjoyed advantages such as no other
small, aspiring town of this section might boast. In the years to come
these advantages were to tell heavily in Trenton’s favor and make
her one of New Jersey’s greatest industrial and commercial centers.
The popularity of the sloop in river
traffic grew with every passing year, and is mirrored in its constantly
increasing use. These boats were very common in this section after the
Revolution, especially during the first three decades of the nineteenth
century. They carried the great bulk of the goods shipped between Trenton
and Philadelphia; their activity made the fortune of many a family in
Bloomsbury and Lamberton, among them those of General John Beatty, Alexander
Chambers and Benjamin Fish.
It was Robert Lettis Hooper who foresaw
the success of the river front south of the creek as a center of transportation.
Hooper had large land holdings in that section; in 1759 he set them
out in lots for a town. His project, planned in view of the contemplated
growing river trade, was described as beginning at Trenton Ferry, being
the head of navigation
. . . where there is a considerable trade extended
from the city of Philadelphia, and great parts of the counties of Hunterdon,
Morris, Middlesex, Somerset and Bucks, in Pennsylvania, deliver their
produce and rafts of timber, boards, staves, headings, &c., come
from 120 miles up the river. 1
1 Pennsylvania
Journal, April 31, 1758; New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XX, P. 273.
During most of the eighteenth, and for at least three
decades of the nineteenth century, then, the sloop practically monopolized
the upstream trade between Philadelphia and Trenton. Against the current,
the value of the raft, the ark and the Durham boat was almost nil. It
was in downstream transportation and, what is more important, in transportation
on the upper Delaware along a channel filled with falls and rapids,
that these boats proved their worth.
The raft put in an early appearance
on the Delaware; in 1764 we find David Skinner navigating the first
one over the 200-mile run extending from Cocheton, 40 miles above Port
Jervis, to Philadelphia. This raft was made of six 70-foot pine tree
logs, strung on poles, or spindles, which passed through holes bored
in the ends of the logs. Upon his arrival in Philadelphia, Skinner was
given the freedom of the city and created “Lord High Admiral of
the Delaware.” He sold the six logs of his raft for masts.
Rafts were used almost exclusively
in getting timber from upstate and New York State down to the Philadelphia
markets. The construction of these craft was simple; logs or timbers
were laid side by side and lashed together; sometimes, as in the case
of Skinner’s raft, holes were bored through timbers of approximately
the same length and a connecting rod slipped through the holes, thus
forming a rigid frame. The passage of the raft from the upper reaches
of the Delaware down to Trenton was accomplished in swift and easy fashion.
The current carried the raft down through the falls and rapids in short
order, the raftsmen using their long poles merely to give a proper direction
to the craft and to keep it off the rocks. Below Trenton the matter
was not so simple; here the current was slower and the raftsmen had
to push on their poles in order to hasten matters along. When the destination
was reached, the rafts were taken apart and sold. Sometimes there was,
also, a supercargo of barrel staves, hogsheads, and the like, but the
practice of sending these down the river on rafts was decidedly risky
and therefore uncommon.
Inhabitants of this region in the latter part of
the eighteenth century and for the first half of the nineteenth were
accustomed to the sight of long strings of rafts floating past Trenton
on their way downstream. In some strings there were as many as thirty
to forty rafts. The raftsmen invariably made an over-night stop in Lamberton,
mooring their long files of rafts at the eddy just below the site of
the American Bridge Company plant. There were several inns in Lamberton
frequented almost exclusively by these rivermen ; of these, the “Red
Tavern” (later known as the Delaware Inn and still standing) below
Landing Street, and the Raftsman’s Inn, on the site known as “the
prairie” south of Cass Street, were the most popular. When the
raftsmen rose in the morning to continue their trip downstream, it was
a common sight to see the river completely blocked by the rafts which
had been moored in it the night before.
Rafting in this region reached its
height just before 1845. In the spring of 1828 as many as one thousand
rafts, containing fifty million feet of lumber, passed by Trenton. A
great percentage of this footage was hemlock. The rafts were usually
floated downstream during the four weeks of the spring freshet season
and in the autumn. The great problem of the raftsmen was, of course,
to avoid the numerous shoals below Trenton and to gain the channel in
which the swiftest current flowed. At the height of the rafting era
in the ‘40’s, the rafts were usually towed down the river
in long strings by the Lenox Towing Company, a firm managed by the Lenoxes
of Lamberton who were well known among the river people of that time.
The Lenox family also owned a wharf and storehouse just above Lalor
Street.
The rapid depletion of the forests
on both sides of the upper Delaware, and the growth of railroad transportation
facilities, put an end to the practice of rafting lumber to the Philadelphia
markets. The raft had been an ingenious device whereby lumber practically
transported itself from one place to another, and when the supply of
timber waned the raft, too, ceased to be.
Another river conveyance in common
use on the Delaware at one time was the so-called “ark.”
Like the raft, it was invented to fill a special need - to carry the
anthracite coal, which had just been discovered in the Lehigh fields,
to the markets on the lower Delaware. The first ark, an experimental
affair, was built by William Trumbull in 1806 at Lausanne, Pa. In that
year it carried ten tons of coal down the river to Philadelphia, but
when it arrived there, it was found that there was hardly any demand
for the fuel. A good deal of the cargo was thrown away into the streets.
It was not until 1814 that transportation
of coal in arks began in a practical way. The usual ark was a rectangular
box, often pointed at one end, and made of heavy pine planks, 16 feet
long, 2 feet wide, and half an inch thick, planed to a fair smoothness.
Like the raft, it too was guided by means of long oars, or poles, placed
at either end. Its dimensions were, roughly, 16 to 18 feet wide and
20 to 25 feet long. The arks, singly or in strings of eight or ten,
were guided down the Lehigh and into the Delaware, past Trenton to Philadelphia.
It was a common occurrence for two or three arks out of every string
to have their bottoms staved in before they had even reached the mouth
of the Lehigh. Yet, despite frequent loss of both arks and cargos, coal
operators found the ark the most economical way of carrying their coal
to market. On arriving at Trenton, or Philadelphia, the coal, ark and
all were sold; the coal usually brought two dollars a ton and the ark
was thrown into the bargain. Shipments by ark continued until the opening
of the Lehigh and Delaware Division Canals in the ‘30’s;
after that, coal was shipped in canal boats over the canal route.
THE DURHAM
BOATS
The Durham boat,
2 known to history because it figured so largely in Washington’s
Christmas Night crossing of the Delaware, was the first of the tide-propelled
freight craft to appear on the river. The boat was used by the Durham
Iron Company as early as 1727, to transport the product of the Durham
forges to Trenton and Philadelphia and to bring back necessary provisions
and supplies. The usual Durham boat was flat-bottomed and had vertical
sides which ran parallel to each other up to a point 12 or 14 feet from
the end, where they began to taper. It was constructed of sturdy inch-and-a-quarter
oak planks, and measured 60 feet long, 8 feet wide, and 42 inches deep.
Its draft was 3 1/2 inches when light and 28 inches loaded; it could
carry 150 barrels of flour or 600 bushels of corn. Downstream it was
possible to load it with as much as 17 tons, but 2 tons was the limit
upstream. It took three men to direct its progress. In going downstream
they made every use of the current and employed their 12- to 18-foot
“setting-poles,” shod with iron, merely for steering. Going
upstream, the poles were used for propelling the boat, the men walking
back and forth on “walking boards” built on the sides of
the Durham boat, the better to gain a maximum effect from the application
of their strength at the ends of the poles.
2
John A. Anderson, Navigation on the Upper Delaware,
p. 16.
The Durham boat was used extensively in carrying
flour, whiskey, meat and iron products from Trenton and points north
along the river to the markets lower down on the Delaware. The men who
guided the heavy boats downstream made Trenton, or more specifically,
Lamberton, their main stopping place.
WHARVES AND WAREHOUSES
The wharves and warehouses used in
local transportation were located almost exclusively in Bloomsbury and
Lamberton. References to them are so few that one cannot hope to reconstruct
the scene of a century ago with any degree of completeness. The more
ancient landings were situated in Lamberton.
Of the first two wharves to be built in Bloomsbury, one was located
about 400 feet south of the lower bridge site and the other on the site
of the municipal terminals at the foot of Ferry Street. The first-mentioned
landing was built in 1803 by Alexander Chambers, to whom the historian,
Hall, refers as the first man to establish Bloomsbury as a port for
sloops. 3 Chambers owned and operated
several sloops on the route between Trenton and Philadelphia. The wharf
near the foot of Ferry Street seems to have been the “steamboat
landing” referred to in many advertisements of the time. It was
probably built about 1809, to accommodate the steamboat Phoenix.
3 Hall,
History of the Presbyterian Church in Trenton, N.J. (rev. ed.),
p. 96.
Adjoining the steamboat wharf and running north for 200 feet along
the river front and for the same distance on Bloomsbury Street in the
rear, was a lot owned by J. R. Smith and E. Evans, on which there was
a wharf. It was probably built after the steamboat wharf was erected.
In 1833 it was owned by Smith alone. To the north of it was the wharf
owned by Benjamin Fish, who was a prominent figure in river transportation
in the early decades of the last century. To this landing came his three
sloops. His warehouse was located in the rear of the wharf, on the lot
next to the southwest corner of what was Ferry and Fair (now Bloomsbury)
Streets. Fish kept a store near his wharf where he took orders for the
stove coal which the arks brought to his wharf direct from the Lehigh
fields. This store, with its goods and groceries, was offered for sale
in 1823. 4
Abraham Mershon also had a landing in this section, a few hundred
feet north of the Trenton Ferry landing at the foot of Ferry Street.
There were other landings nearby, but their owners and the years of
their erection are unknown.
4 Federalist,
June 16, 1823.
The first mention of a wharf in Lamberton is found in an advertisement
5
published in 1764. There was a storehouse attached to the landing.
William Richards had a landing in Lamberton near the foot of Landing
Street during the Revolution; from it ran his schooner, the Lamberton
Packet, which carried passengers and goods to and from Philadelphia.
6 Very early
in the 1800’s Philip H. Howell built a wharf in Lamberton near
the steamboat landing. The wharf, along with his lumberyard, house and
stores, was advertised to let in 1819. 7
Howell’s warehouse was opposite Benjamin Fish’s storehouse
on Fair Street. Several other wharves existed below the steamboat landing.
Among them may be noted the two docks at the foot of Lalor Street, one
immediately below the line of the street and the other just to the north
of it. There was a wharf situated on the river bank several hundred
yards above the latter landing. At one time it belonged to the Lenox
family of Lamberton, along with a warehouse of fair size. Both wharf
and warehouse were destroyed in the ice freshet of 1852. Recent excavations
have unearthed evidences of old warehouses and docks below Lalor Street,
but who owned them is unknown. Elijah Bond had a small landing on his
tract below the present site of Riverview cemetery, in the middle of
the eighteenth century.
5 The
Pennsylvania Journal, May 10, 1764; New
Jersey Archives, Vol. XXIV, p. 361.
6 New
Jersey Gazette, September 9, 1778; New
Jersey Archives, 2nd Ser., Vol. II, p. 414.
7
Federalist, January
19, 1818.
The only record of a wharf north of the Falls is that referring to
the one owned and operated by John Rutherford, the owner of Beatty’s
ferry, of which further mention will soon be made. In an advertisement
appearing in 1806, 8
Rutherford speaks of his large wharf as the only one above Trenton Falls
for the Easton and Durham boats trading there. In an earlier day there
were wharves in Little River, the stream which flowed between Gravel
Island and the mainland. They were situated along the present-day Mahlon
Stacy Wall, back of the State House.
8 ibid.,
September 29, 1806.
STEAM NAVIGATION
The eighteenth century, then, depended
on the tide, the wind, and human energy to move its boats. The century
was almost done when John Fitch came along with the first practical
application of steam to the moving of a vessel. Fitch’s invention
preceded Fulton’s Clermont by a round score of years. It is not
until recently that he has received due credit for the part he played
in the invention of the steamboat.
Fitch was born in what is now South Windsor, Conn.,
on January 21, 1743 (O.S.). As a boy he was apprenticed to a watchmaker;
from this he turned to following the sea, but it, too, failed to hold
him for long. Back home, he stumbled into an unfortunate marriage, and
this, coupled with his father’s tyranny, drove him into leaving
Connecticut forever. Fitch wandered down to Trenton in 1769, and was
taken in as an apprentice by Matthew Clunn, a tinsmith and maker of
brass buttons. This was in May. During the summer he worked under James
Wilson at silversmithing, but in September he took to peddling brass
and silver buttons around the neighboring countryside. As a member of
the Continental army during the early years of the Revolution, Fitch
managed a gun shop here in which he employed as many as 60 men in turning
out work for the New Jersey troops. When the British came into this
section, Fitch, along with many Trentonians, crossed the river into
Bucks County. In 1780, and in the three or four years following, he
made several trips into the territory now known as Kentucky; on one
of these excursions he was captured by the Indians, turned over to the
British, taken to Canada, and finally sent back to New York in an exchange
of prisoners.
It was after his return home to Bucks
County that he conceived the idea of applying steam to navigation. The
date is usually indicated as April 1785. By August he was exhibiting
his first boat - a small, crude affair, propelled by paddle wheels run
by a tiny engine - to the provosts of the University of Pennsylvania
and to the authorities at Princeton College. Later in the month he petitioned
Congress for aid in completing his invention, “adapted especially
for the waters of the Mississippi,” but the application was never
reported out of committee.
JOHN
FITCH’S STEAMBOAT
In September Fitch rigged up another model, fitted
with long paddles on either side, moving on two endless chains running
from stem to stern. Several weeks later he petitioned the Virginia Legislature
for assistance, and then the Pennsylvania and Maryland Legislatures.
None gave him aid. Perhaps the most bitter disappointment experienced
by Fitch at this time came at the hands of Benjamin Franklin, the dean
of American science, or natural philosophy, as it was then called. Most
of the evidence comes from Fitch. He writes that he approached Benjamin
Franklin for a certificate testifying to the merits of his invention,
and though Franklin praised his endeavor, he evaded giving him a certificate.
Instead, he made Fitch an offer of charity, which Fitch refused. In
this connection, it is interesting to note a letter written by Franklin
from Philadelphia in 1788:
We have no philosophical news here at present, except
that a boat, moved by a steam-engine, rows itself against tide in our
river, and it is apprehended that the construction may be so simplified
and improved as to be generally useful.
Franklin, it would seem then, was impressed
with the possibility of Fitch’s invention, but not with the crude
plan which he presented to him. There were refinements to be made, plans
to be modified, before he could testify to the practical and efficient
qualities of the boat.
It was shortly after this meeting with
Franklin that the New Jersey Legislature granted Fitch the exclusive
franchise for 14 years
. . . of constructing, making, using and employing,
or navigating, all and every species or kind of boats, or water craft,
which might be urged or impelled by force of fire or steam, in all the
creeks, rivers, etc., within the territory of this State.
Stacy Potts, Isaac Smith, Robert Pearson,
Jr., Samuel Tucker, Abraham Hunt, Rensselaer Williams, John and Charles
Clunn, and others of Trenton, lent their names to the petition for the
franchise.
With this encouragement, Fitch went about the organizing
of a company. Stacy Potts was among those who subscribed to the initial
fund of $300. The builder of the boat, Henry Voight, of Philadelphia,
received stock of the company for his work. The boat was a small one,
with an engine possessing a single cylinder of 3-inch bore. The first
trials on the Delaware, held July 20, 1786, were unsuccessful. Fitch
had experimented with several methods of propelling the boat; the plan
that succeeded was that in which the side paddles were moved by cranks
worked by an engine. The first boat in America to be propelled successfully
by steam moved on the Delaware on July 27, 1786. It was an enthusiastic
Fitch who wrote to Stacy Potts from Philadelphia the next day. “We
have tried every part, and reduced it to as certain a thing as can be,
that we shall not come short of ten miles per hour, if not twelve or
fourteen. I will say fourteen in theory and twelve in practice.”
Fitch’s fond belief never materialized, even in the most efficient
of his models. His first successful boat made several trips on the river
near Philadelphia in the autumn of 1786.
|
|
In need of further funds, Fitch applied
to the Pennsylvania Legislature the same year, but he was unsuccessful.
Delaware, however, confirmed his right to his invention. In February
1787, Fitch’s shareholders agreed to advance additional capital
for the building of a 45-foot vessel; equipped with an engine containing
a single 12-inch cylinder. Lacking skilled workmen, Fitch had to depend
upon fumbling blacksmiths in the manufacture of this new engine. Their
faulty work was the cause of many accidents and delays. Finally the
boat moved on the river in full view of practically the entire Continental
Convention (August 22, 1787). Fitch thought it an appropriate time for
once again petitioning the Continental Congress for aid; this time the
bill was reported out of committee, but died on the floor of the House.
The new boat traversed the Philadelphia-Burlington
route for the first time in July 1788. At the end of the run, the boiler
burst and the ship had to be floated back to Philadelphia. A new boiler
was installed and on October 16 Fitch ran his steamboat, on which were
a company of prominent guests, up the Delaware to Burlington, and then
on to Trenton, returning to Philadelphia the same day.
In order to cut down the time on the
Philadelphia-Trenton run to five hours, an auxiliary company was formed
to finance the building of a new 18-inch cylinder engine. During 1789
the boat made several trips to Burlington and Trenton, but regular service
could not be maintained because of the unreliable machinery. This steamboat
was the last of Fitch’s boats and the most successful one. It
made its last trips on the Delaware in 1790. An advertisement which
appeared on June 14 of that year informed the public that:
The Steam Boat Is now ready to take Passengers,
and is intended to set off from Arch Street Ferry in Philadelphia every
Monday, Wednesday and Friday, for Burlington and Trenton, to return
on Tuesdays, Thursdays and .Saturdays. - Price for Passengers, 2/6 to
Burlington and Bristol, 3/9 to Bordentown, 5/ to Trenton.
This craft was the first steam vessel
anywhere to be employed in the business of transporting passengers and
freight. The boat made more or less regular trips up and down the river
during the summer and fall of 1790. Those who travelled on it placed
its speed at eight miles an hour. 9
9 Watson’s
Annals, Vol. II, p. 446.
Congress granted Fitch letters patent on his invention
in April 1791. When Fitch visited France, Louis XVI granted him a patent,
but the French Revolution put an end to whatever use Fitch might have
intended to make of this right. Fitch’s plans, left behind in
France, are commonly supposed to have furnished Fulton with ideas for
his successful Clermont.
Tired and embittered, Fitch withdrew
from a world that had shown him little kindness. He settled on his tract
at Bardstown, Ky. There he died on July 2, 1798, the circumstances of
his death pointing to suicide. His grave was soon forgotten, but in
recent years the John Fitch Chapter of the Daughters of the American
Revolution found it again and removed Fitch’s ashes to a new grave
in front of the Bardstown Court House. The grave is marked with a monument.
Fitch’s genius is also commemorated by a bronze tablet in the
Hartford, Conn., capitol building. John Fitch Way and the John Fitch
memorial boulder and tablet are Trenton’s tribute to the inventor.
John Fitch Way runs from the municipal wharf along the river front as
far as Assunpink Creek. It was formerly Commercial Avenue, but the name
was changed by an ordinance passed early in 1921. The Fitch boulder
was dredged from the river and set up at the lower end of John Fitch
Way, near the municipal wharf. After an appropriate bronze tablet had
been attached, it was dedicated on November 30, 1921.
OTHER EARLY
STEAMBOATS
The work of Fitch and Rumsey and Fulton paved the
way for the practical use of steam in river transportation. In 1809
we find a steamboat leaving Beatty’s wharf in Bloomsbury for Philadelphia, 10 every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday,
and returning from that place the next day.
11 This steamboat was the famous Phoenix,
built by John Stevens at Hoboken in 1808 for travel on New York waters.
Fulton obtained an injunction against Stevens on the ground that his
project would trespass upon Fulton’s exclusive right to the use
of the waters of New York State. Stevens thereupon sent the Phoenix
from Hoboken down to Philadelphia under her own steam in 1808. A storm
came up, the pilot boat became separated from the steamboat, and the
Phoenix, long overdue at Philadelphia, was given up for lost.
The Phoenix, however, rode out the storm and ended up in Barnegat
Bay, from which place she proceeded on to Philadelphia. She was the
first steamboat ever to travel upon any ocean.
10 Federalist,
August 7, 1809.
11 ibid.,
May 11, 1812.
The Phoenix belonged to the Swiftsure Line and was in the command
of Captain Degraw. Her running time between here and Philadelphia was
three hours running with the stream and five hours against it. The Phoenix
was on this route until 1821, when she grounded on the mud flats at
Kensington.
The presence of steamboats on the Delaware did not affect the extensive
sloop trade to any marked degree at first. It was not until a decade
later - about 1820 - that their competition began to tell. In 1810 the
sloop Factor set out regularly from its Bloomsbury landing every
Monday during the milder season, and returned from Philadelphia on Thursdays.
12
Captain McKean was in charge. The sloop Traveller, too, maintained
a regular packet service weekly on the same route. 13 Like the Factor,
it carried both freight and passengers. Its wharf was the “upper
Bloomsbury landing,” which Alexander Chambers had built back in
1803. This landing was also known as Beatty’s landing and Bloomsbury
landing, and was the most important landing in Bloomsbury. In 1812 we
find the sloop Try-All, under the command of Captain Johnston,
maintaining a regular packet service to Philadelphia. This sloop had
once been owned by Alexander Chambers and General Beatty, 14 but the partnership was
dissolved in 1812 and Chambers became sole owner. Chambers’ assignees
advertised his landing, the Try-All, his storehouse and lot of
ground along the Delaware, for sale in 1817. 15
12 Federalist,
May 10, 1810.
13 ibid.,
July 8, 1812.
14 ibid.,
March 9, 1812.
15 ibid.,
September 15, 1817.
The Trenton sloops played an important part in rendering the British
blockade at New York and Philadelphia during the War of 1812 for nought.
These sloops transported all sorts of military supplies from Philadelphia
to Trenton, where they were loaded on wagons and taken to New Brunswick,
there to be carried forward to New York.
From 1810 to 1820 there were several steamboats on the Delaware between
Philadelphia and Bordentown, among them the Philadelphia. This
boat was in the command of Captain Jenkins of the Union Line, and it
travelled the Philadelphia-Bristol route. Stages met the boat at the
latter place and carried the passengers forward to Trenton and New Brunswick.
Boats stopping at Burlington or Bordentown were also met by stages at
these places. Nathaniel Shuff of Bloomsbury was the proprietor of one
of these stage lines. His stage carried the passengers to Trenton and
points as far beyond as New York.
16
16 ibid.,
August 6, 1810.
The Philadelphia was also known as Old Sal, probably
because of the grotesque female figurehead which she carried on her
bow. In 1815 we find her on the Trenton route, running from Philadelphia
every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 8 a.m. and returning to Trenton
on the next day. 17
The Philadelphia was on the Trenton route as early as 1814 and
continued to make regular trips during the late spring, summer and autumn
seasons until at least 1825. 18
17 ibid.,
April 17, 1815.
18
ibid., August 9, 1824.
AN ERA OF KEEN RIVALRY
With the ‘20’s a keen rivalry arose between the steamboat
lines on the river, particularly between the Union Line and the Citizens’
Line. In the decade before, the Citizens’ Line had built the New
York for service on the lower Delaware. The Union Line countered
with the New Philadelphia, which it put on the same route in
1815. The next move of the Citizens’ Line was to build the Pennsylvania,
about 1825, which ran from Philadelphia to Bordentown. The Union Line
answered the challenge with the Trenton, running between Philadelphia
and Trenton.
James A. Stevens, owner of the Philadelphia, did not permit
this competition to pass unnoticed; he put the Franklin into
the Trenton-Philadelphia service and lowered the fare to one dollar
each way. 19 The next year another
firm put the Congress on the same route, making trips daily,
except on Sundays. Carriages met the boat at the Bloomsbury wharf and
carried the passengers up to the Trenton hotels gratis. This service
was imitated by all the boats - the Stevens-owned Philadelphia
and Franklin, and the Trenton of the Union Line. Philadelphia-bound
passengers were called for at their hotels on the morning of their departure
and carried to the wharves free of charge. The Union Line stages were
especially efficient in this service; those wishing to be carried to
the Trenton or the Baltimore (which was put into service
in 1827) on the morrow had but to leave their names at Joseph Bispham’s
Trenton House, or at Aaron O. Shuff’s Steamboat Hotel near the
wharf in Bloomsbury, or at the Union Line office proper, which was located
opposite the Trenton House on Warren Street, several doors below the
Rising Sun Hotel. 20
In the period when competition was great (1825-30) the Union Line hacks
called for the passengers at their homes and hotels, but in 1832, when
the line was having things pretty much its own way on the river, the
stages went direct from the Union Line office to the wharf, taking up
only such passengers as presented themselves at the office.
21
19 ibid.,
August 9, 1824.
20 ibid.,
March 19, 1827.
21 New
Jersey Gazette, October 20, 1832.
The Union Line Company, of which Benjamin Fish was the president, also
carried passengers in its stages between the steamboat landing and Princeton,
New Brunswick and New York, at fixed rates. A. P. Atkinson was the Trenton
agent for the Union Line coaches. After the Camden and Amboy Railroad
and Transportation Company was incorporated, the various lines on the
river, including the Union, Citizens’ and Dispatch, were merged
into the larger company. This company took over the Union Line Company’s
stages and Trenton hack service. Many of the sloop lines also found
their way into the hands of this corporation.
Before this huge merging process took place there were a few changes
in the list of river steamers. In 1827 came the Union Line Baltimore,
22
mentioned above, and this was displaced in a few months by the steamer
Burlington. 23
The Union Line added the Marco Bozzaris to its Philadelphia-Trenton
route in 1828, 24
and in 1832 the line put the Robert Morris into the same service.
25 The Emerald, owned
by the Dispatch Line, which had the backing of Cornelius Vanderbilt,
is supposed to have been in the Trenton service at this time, but there
is no corroborating record.
22 Federalist,
March 19, 1827.
23 ibid.,
July 2, 1827.
24 ibid.,
August 11, 1828.
25 New
Jersey Gazette, October 20, 1832.
In May 1841 the Major Barnet, a 110-foot boat, licensed to carry
passengers, came to Trenton. Its owners intended it for the transportation
of passengers and goods between Lambertville and Easton. The problem,
of course, was to run the steamboat through the falls. Several unsuccessful
attempts were made in the summer of 1841, but it was not until November
that the Major Barnet achieved the upper Delaware. John H. Morris,
a riverman, found the 22 inches of water necessary for navigating the
boat, and steered it up through Trenton Falls to the foot of Wells Falls
without difficulty. At Wells Falls it was necessary to use full steam,
two men with poles, and men tugging at a rope which had been fastened
to the rocks at the entrance to the falls, before the boat got through.
It took the Major Barnet ten minutes to travel 110 feet, but
it was done, and the boat was the first steamboat on the upper Delaware.
She was active in the Easton trade, but the railroad put her out of
business.26
26 Trenton
Times-Advertiser, March 28, 1909.
In 1840 the Hornet appeared on the Delaware and plied between
Trenton and Philadelphia. The fare was 25c and persons leaving their
name at the Rising Sun Hotel the night before would be called for by
the omnibus the next morning. Abner Mershon’s Proprietor
was on the same route in 1843, but ran only a short time. On May 7,
1849, the Edwin Forrest made her first trip to Trenton. She ran
daily except in winter between Trenton and Philadelphia for many years,
being obliged to regulate her departure by the tide because of the shoals
at Perriwig Island below. Her wharf was in the rear of Bloomsbury House.
The boat was owned by Joseph and Benjamin McMackin.
As a matter of fact there were two Edwin Forrests, the first
one a wooden steam-boat and the second, which began to run in 1865,
being of iron construction. The second one carried great quantities
of freight and was well patronized by passengers, making the river trip
for business or pleasure. Captain Joseph H. McIntyre succeeded Captain
Benjamin McMackin and was on the bridge up to the time she was retired
in 1895. Considering that there was an Edwin Forrest in service
for forty-seven years, it is not surprising that many local memories
are enshrined about the name.
All freight brought to Trenton by the sloops and steamboats during
the first half of the century was transferred to heavy wagons and hauled
to New Brunswick, where it was placed on ships to be carried to New
York. Some of the goods were kept, for the time being, in the many warehouses
along the river.
The steamboats which covered the Trenton-Philadelphia route in a later
day included the Twilight, City of Trenton (which finally
blew up because of a boiler explosion), Pokonoket, Burlington,
Columbia and John A. Warner. During the 1910 decade, the
Trenton Transportation Company operated the Queen Anne and the
Dolphin. The landing for these boats was just below Lalor Street,
and adjoining it was a warehouse.
TRENTON AS A PORT OF ENTRY
Trenton was created a port of entry by an Act of
Congress, just before the Civil War. The official name was “Port
of Trenton, District of Burlington,” and a Collector of Customs
was appointed whose duty it was to register all vessels plying the Delaware
River or the Delaware and Raritan Canal, between Trenton and Philadelphia.
He also had to certify shipments of merchandise bought in foreign ports,
and the license papers of every ship operating over the route just mentioned.
Those who held the office of Collector of Customs were Captain Harry
Ashmore, William Ashmore and Captain John A. Wilson. The office was
later transferred to Camden and Philadelphia.
The ever-present obstacle to Trenton’s
becoming a large port was the lack of a channel of sufficient depth
to insure the safety of vessels venturing up the river from Philadelphia.
The present mayor of Trenton, Frederick W. Donnelly, has been largely
instrumental in bringing about the necessary deepening of the channel.
DEEPENING THE CHANNEL
There had been previous attempts to
have the Delaware cleared. By Act of General Assembly, passed December
21, 1771, a commission was appointed to receive subscriptions for clearing
the river above Trenton Falls as far as Easton. The commissioners had
power to clear, open, enlarge, straighten or deepen the river. The work
was subcontracted out, Major Robert Hoops actually doing the work near
Trenton Falls and completing the task in 1791.
It was in the period immediately preceding
the coming of the railroad that a real interest was manifested in improving
the Delaware. In 1811 the inhabitants of Burlington and Hunterdon petitioned
the Legislature relative to removing the sandbar on Perriwig Island.
The committee of the House was averse both to recommending a grant from
the Treasury for financing the work or permitting a lottery to be raised
locally. It did, however, recommend that the petitioners be allowed
to present a bill which would authorize them to go upon Perriwig Island
and remove the obstruction themselves. Nothing, however, was done in
the matter.
On November 13, 1809, the Legislature had passed
an Act authorizing the building of a lock in the river at Trenton, for
the improvement of navigation. The purpose of this lock is indicated
by the text of a like Act, passed February 9, 1815, authorizing Daniel
W. Coxe, Samuel Wright, Jr., and Peter T. Smith to build a wing dam
in the river opposite Market Street, “to have a lock in the same,
where it crossed that part of the river on the east side of Yard’s
Island, of such size and dimensions that Durham boats of the largest
size and other craft may pass up and through the same with ease and
safety; the lock to be not less than twenty feet wide.”
The work of deepening the channel from
Philadelphia to Trenton was not started until the present century. On
June 25, 1910, the federal government adopted the project for a channel
12 feet deep at mean low water, and 200 feet wide, from Alleghany Avenue,
Philadelphia, to Lalor Street, Trenton, and for the construction of
dikes at Biles Island, Bordentown, and Mud Island. The work was completed,
except for the Mud Island dike, in 1913, at the cost of $311,000. Annual
maintenance was estimated at $20,000. The greatest amount of dredging
by far was done in the channel between Trenton and Bordentown.
The project for deepening the channel
above Lalor Street as far as the railroad bridge was adopted by the
federal government on July 25, 1912. The plan called for a 12-foot channel,
200 feet wide, and a turning basin at the site of the municipal wharf,
300 feet wide and 400 feet long. By the River and Harbor Act of June
5, 1920, Congress combined this project and the one of 1910 into a single
project. Work on the municipal dock was begun May 6, 1915; the upper
section of the united project, including the excavation of approximately
20,000 cubic yards of rock, was completed August 1921. The estimated
cost of the entire improvement is $825,000, with an estimated cost of
maintenance of $25,000 annually. The wharves, warehouse shed and other
property at the municipal wharf alone cost $280,000, while the additional
land for John Fitch Way and contemplated future developments brought
the total up to $365,000.
The 12-foot channel has made Trenton an important
commercial center, since it enables larger ships to come all the way
up the river. The improvement of the channel, however, will continue.
The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925, adopted a new project providing
for an increased channel depth of 20 feet at mean low water between
Philadelphia and the Trenton municipal wharf, having a width of 200
to 300 feet. The estimated cost will be $1,326,000. This project
is being urged by the Atlantic Deeper Waterways Association, which was
organized in Philadelphia in 1907 and whose main object is the creation
of an intra-coastal canal, extending from New England to Florida. In
1928, vessels could navigate inland from Trenton to Beaufort, N.C.,
over a 12-foot channel. A waterway across New Jersey from Morgan, on
Raritan Bay, to the Delaware River just above Bordentown will complete
the inland chain from Boston to Beaufort. Further mention of this waterway
will be made under the discussion of canals.
At present the Philadelphia-Trenton-Norfolk
Steamboat Company is operating barges and tugs for carrying freight,
as well as the passenger boat William Penn which runs during
the summer, over the 12-foot channel. Sea-going barges of 1000-ton capacity
frequently find their way up to Trenton.
The municipal wharf and warehouses
were dedicated on May 11, 1919. The dock is 200 feet wide and extends
inshore 250 feet. The steel warehouse shed, whose flat roof is used
as a recreation center in the summer-time, is located at the upper end
of the dock and measures 115 feet by 195 feet.
II. Roads and Highways
AT THE time that the Shield
came up the Delaware, there were no roads in this vicinity. Only paths
led from one Indian settlement to another. The path beginning at “Inian’s
Ferry” on the Raritan and leading to the “Falls of the Delaware”
was the forerunner of the New Brunswick-Trenton road. This path is supposed
to have been opened by the Dutch early in the seventeenth century. When
William Edmundson, travelling minister of the Society of Friends, traversed
this route in 1675 on his way southward, he found only a narrow path
leading to the Falls. Of his trip he wrote:
We travelled that Day, and saw no tame creature,
at Night we kindled a fire in the Wilderness and lay by it, as we used
to do in such Journies; next day, about nine in the Morning, by the
good Hand of God, we came well by the Falls.
27
27
A Journal of the Life, Travels, Sufferings, etc., of
William Edmundson, 2nd ed., p. 107.
About seventy years later (1748), Kalm, the Swedish
traveller, was to say of the same route:
On the road from Trenton to Brunswick I never saw
any place in America, the towns excepted, so well peopled.
The book of minutes of the Supreme Court (1681-1709) provides us with
interesting notes on the growth of the system of roads in this vicinity.
The first overseers of highways in the first tenth were appointed May
22, 1683, and were John Woolston and John Shinn. February 20, 1690,
saw the choosing of an overseer for the highways of Nottingham Township
for the first time. John Lambert was the first overseer for Nottingham.
The duties of this office must have increased by reason of the laying
out of more roads, for in February 1692-93, two overseers were appointed
to attend the roads in that township.
THE BURLINGTON ROAD
The grand jury of Burlington “presented”
that County for not laying out and taking care of a lawful highway “where
they are wanted - to ye ffalls,” in May 1692. Here is the earliest
mention of a road leading from Trenton to Burlington. In 1693, the court
ordered Nottingham and Chesterfield to lay out a road to East Jersey.
Where this road was, or whether it was ever laid out, is unknown.
At the February 1696-97 sessions of the Burlington
County Court, Maidenhead Township was formed from that part of Nottingham
Township lying north of the Assunpink. The next year the court ordered
the constable of Maidenhead to call “twelve sufficient men”
to lay out the King’s Highway from a point on the Province line
to the Assunpink. This minute in the court book is the first mention
one finds of the path from “Inian’s Ferry” to the
Falls being designated as the King’s Highway. The route of the
present Lincoln Highway follows, approximately, that of the old King’s
Highway, which ran down to the Assunpink along the present line of Broad
Street. The constable returned the following description of the highway:
Beginning on ye sd line at Yorke old Roade at ye
Corner of Joseph Worth’s land, thence to ye eight mile Runne thence
through Jonathan Daviss his land Improved & Inclosed, thence over
ye six mile Runn through Theophilus Philips land, thence over several
mens lands and over Thomas Smiths land to ye five mile Runne thence
over Mahlon Stacys land to Assanpink Creeke neare ye mill of Mahlon
Stacy.
THE MAIDENHEAD
ROAD
Dissatisfaction was widespread in Maidenhead
in 1698 because of the existence of two roads running from the town
down to the Assunpink. Accordingly, a precept was directed by the court
to the constable to call the inhabitants together and put the matter
to a vote, so that the “Road which shall be pitcht upon &
approved of by the majority of votes shall be the Establisht road.”
Maidenhead Road, as it existed in 1699, is given by the following abstract
to be found in the Supreme Court minutes:
Begins at the partition line; by marked trees to
8 mile run; to a white oak in land of Johannes Lawrence; by marked trees
to a white oak before Ralph Hunts door by the run; by marked trees to
bridge over 6 mile run to Robt Lannings Land; thence direct through
Wm Acres land and Jasper Smiths land and Thos Smiths land to 5 mile
run to a hiceree tree; by Samuell Mathews and Saml Stacy to Shabakunck
Bridge; thence through Mahlon Stacy to mill as trees direct.
Mention is again made of the road leading from Burlington
to the Assunpink in the Supreme Court minutes under date of the 19th
of the twelfth month (February), 1702. On that day the inhabitants of
Nottingham presented the following petition to the justices sitting
at Burlington:
Whereas there has been for more than twenty years
past a Highway Leading from the ffalls towards Burlington over Croswick
Creeke through the plantation now of Samll Overton which Much Shortens
the journey as well as for the Convenancy of Travelers as also for ye
Inhabitants of the township of Nottingham and Whereupon the Inhabitants
at their Last towne meeting Were Unanimously Concenting and did there
all Concent and agree (Excepting the said Samll Overton) that the same
should be so Continued and remaine as a free Bridle Stye and way for
travelers and therefore humbly prays the Concurrence of the Court in
Confirmation of the same. –
Signed in Behalfe of the Town p. Willm Emley Clerk. Whereupon the Court
Orders that it shall continue a Bridle Way.
The description of the Burlington Road as a "Bridle Way"
incidentally indicates what most of the "roads" of that time
actually were, - paths wide enough to permit of the passage of a man
on horseback or a packhorse. These "roads" continued to be
nothing more than bridle ways until 1716, when the Assembly passed an
Act for the "Further establishment of Fees, and Ferriages."
It was not until almost 1800 that they were to become two-, four- and
six-rod-wide roads.
The abstract set out above shows that
the Burlington “Bridle Way” had existed as far back as 1682.
In 1700, then, but two land routes of any importance existed in this
section: the King’s Highway and the path leading to Burlington.
The King’s Highway was variously known as the Old Yorke Road and
the road to Maidenhead. The road to Burlington was sometimes referred
to as the road to Crosswicks.
THE PENNINGTON ROAD
The proprietors, in order to encourage
the building of roads throughout the Province, had been very liberal
in their concessions. Thus, in 1676 the West Jersey proprietors agreed
that:
We do also grant convenient Portions of Land for Highways, and for
Streets, not under one Hundred Foot in Breadth, in Cities, Towns and
Villages.
And for Wharfs, Keys, Harbours, and for publicly
Houses in such Places as the Commissioners for the Times being . . .
shall appoint, and that all such Lands . . . shall be free and exempt
from all Rents, Taxes and other Charges.
It will be noted that the proprietors were especially
interested in having wider roads built than those in existence at the
time.
In 1681the General Assembly, in order
to promote the building of roads and overcome the resistance shown by
landowners through whose lands the roads were laid, directed that “reasonable
satisfaction” be given “at the Discretion of the Commissioners”
for land taken up for use as public highways. This is the first example
of a law, directing that compensation be given for the taking of private
property for public use, in the legal history of New Jersey. In 1683
it was enacted that all highways laid out in the Province of West Jersey
should be maintained by “the respective Tenth’s, wherein
the same lye . . . .” In May of the following year, the General
Assembly appointed Joshua Weight, Thomas Lambert, Percifall Towle, Godfrey
Hancock, Elias Farre and John Woolston, commissioners for the laying
out of highways in the first tenth. In March 1713-14, the Assembly provided
that no action for waste would lie against those who cut and carried
away timber standing within the limits of the highways of the Province,
if it were used for making or repairing bridges and highways.
By 1750, apparently, the King’s
Highway had become a frequently travelled route. In 1745, John Dalley,
a surveyor of Kingston, advertised in the Pennsylvania Gazette
that he had just made a survey of the road leading “from Trenton
to Amboy and set up durable markers every two miles and at each branching
road.” 28
As we shall see later, a stage had been running from Trenton to Philadelphia
twice a week since 1737. The road must have become substantially wider
and smoother to allow of this sort of travel, although there was still
room for a great deal of improvement.
28 Pennsylvania
Gazette, September 12, 1745; New Jersey
Archives, Vol. XII, p. 273.
Our attention is narrowed down to the
roads immediately in and around Trenton by the Minute Book of the Township
of Trenton, containing the minutes of the annual meetings of the inhabitants
f rom 1755 to 1816. At the first meeting, held March 11, 1755, the overseers
of roads mentioned are: Alexander Chambers, “Overseer of ye roads”;
Benjamin Hart, for “Rodger road”; John Burrows, for the
“upper part of the Middle Road beginning a corner stone by David
Howells & from thence up to ye Line of Hopewell.” In 1756,
a new office of overseer was created, John Howell being chosen overseer
for the “River Road” at the annual meeting held March 9.
At that time we find that “The Town of Trenton agrees to take
the river Road as far as Joseph Warrill, esq’s Gate before his
doore of ye same to keep in repaire.” The minutes of the annual
meeting held March 8, 1757, mention a different classification of overseers:
“Richd Green & Joseph Green, overseers of Rodgers roads; John
Chambers for Trenton Roads; Benjn Green for ye upper Roads.”
At this point in the minutes we find
a “Retorn of Penny-town or Hopewell Road,” made back in
1741. It is interesting because in it we find the first written mention
of Penny-town (Pennington) Road.
To all whome these may come, know yee that whereas, there was a proper
application made unto us the Subscribers, Surveyors for ye Counties
of Hunterdon & Burlington, to alter & Regulate ye Roads commonly
known by ye Name of ye Middle or Rodgers Road, by Severall of ye Inhabitants
of ye said Road, Rendering for reasons as followeth (viz.) that there
is a retorn found of Late of said Road, wch said Retorn is dated in
ye year 1700, wch is so long Since, that many of ye Inhabitants would
be much prejudist at this time, by the former Retorn. And wee therefore,
by vertue of a Law of the province to us Commited & in Such Case
made & provided, Do disanull all former Retorns heretofore made
weither they are Reccorded or not, for as much of ye abovesd Road, as
followeth, from ye Lane wch Leads from said Road to Joseph Yard’s
mill to York road wch leads through Maidenhead to Trenton, to all intents
& porposes as though there never had been a Retorn made, And wee
do Lay out that Road as folllweth (viz.) four Rods wide Beginning at
ye End of the Lane abovesd & from thence by ye Severall Courses
as ye Road now goes by custom or any other wise, till it comes to Land
between Rober Laning & Joseph Greens then on ye Line between ye
said Laning & Green as far as the sd Laning’s Land exstends
& from thence by ye Severall courses as it now goes to the abovesade
York Road, commonly known by ye Name of Maidenhead Road & along
ye said Maidenhead road by ye East side of Joseph Higbey’s and
Benjamen Smiths down to ye Line of Division between hunterdon &
Burlington given under our hands this twenty Eight day of December &
in ye year of our Lord Seventeen hundred and fourty one. 1741.
This document also reveals the highly
important information that the Pennington-Hopewell Road was then known
as “ye Middle or Rodgers Road” in its several parts. It
also definitely identifies the York Road as Maidenhead Road, the highway
leading from Trenton to Lawrenceville (once Maidenhead). Middle Road,
as we shall see, is the present-day Scotch Road, and Rodgers Road was
soon to be known as Pennington Road.
The commissioners for the laying out and altering
of roads for Hunterdon County laid out a road from Samuel Henry’s
grist mills to Maidenhead Road in May 1758. The description in the township
minutes reads:
We do agree the Begining of ye said Road at the
end of ye said Henry’s Ditch, thence to run a Four Rod road on
ye Line between ye said Henry & Moore Forman to a Stake from thence
on a Straight Line Between Peter Hankinson & Wm Eley to Maidenhead
Road ....
The present line of Mulberry Street
approximately follows the line of this road. A survey made in 1774 established
the course now followed almost exactly by that street.
THE SCOTCH OR
“MIDDLE” ROAD
The minutes of the annual township
meeting, held March 10, 1761, mention that Benjamin Green was chosen
overseer “for ye Scotch or Middle Road.” This is the first
mention we find in the records of Scotch Road. In 1767 the minutes revert
to the use of the old name of “Middle Road,” but in later
annual meetings, the name is definitely dropped for “Scotch Road.”
In the 1761 minutes one also finds the item that “Whereas there
is a Road laid out to Samll Henry’s Mill, it is therefore agreed
by said town that the overseer of ye Roads have power to warn any of
the Inhabitants of said township to work on said road.” The roads
in and about Trenton at this time were invariably repaired by the inhabitants,
upon whom the overseers could call to contribute their share of manual
labor to the completion of the task. The period when hired workers kept
the roads in condition and were paid out of the money raised by taxes
was still, in those days, a thing of the future.
“Shabicunk Road” is first
mentioned in the township minutes of March 13, 1764. The road ran approximately
along the route now followed by Prospect Street and continued north
by east in the same line, across Shabakunk Creek.
Travel along the main highways during
Colonial days was, at best, a very slow and uncomfortable experience.
The roads were far from level, full of mire holes, rocks, stumps and
pools of water. The bridges were not always in good repair; the roads
wound this way and that, without any guide posts whatsoever to direct
the traveller except in those cases where private enterprise had set
up direction-posts and milestones. Private coaches rarely traversed
the King’s Highway leading northeast out of Trenton; only the
stages, His Majesty’s post, travellers on horseback or farmers
carrying their produce to market on horses, used the route. In 1765
the General Assembly decided to act in the matter, and on June 20 passed
the following Act:
Whereas the Shortening and Improvement of Roads
will greatly facilitate the Conveyance of Letters by the Post, be of
great Importance to His Majesty’s Service, and to commercial Interest
and general Convenience of the Inhabitants of this Province . . . .
BE IT ENACTED . . . That John Berrien, Daniel Coxe, Azariah Dunham,
Abraham Clark, junior and Ephraim Terrill, Esquires, be and are
hereby appointed Commissioners to view the Grounds, make a straight
and perfect Survey from Borden-town to Kingston, and from
Trenton as near as may through Princeton, Kingston, New-Brunswick,
Elizabeth-town and Newark to Second-River . . . .
The commissioners were empowered to
draw a lottery for such sums as they might deem necessary for carrying
out the project, not to exceed the sum of £500 proclamation money
of the Province.
The notices advertising this lottery
appeared in the New York and Philadelphia newspapers in 1765. The straight
roads project was, however, delayed by the Stamp Act agitation. In the
New York Journal or General Advertiser for December 1766, the
lottery is again advertised. Daniel Coxe, of Trenton, is mentioned among
those in charge of the drawing of the lottery, and is also announced
as manager and commissioner of the road from Newark and Elizabeth-town
to Trenton and Bordentown, agreeable to the Act of the year preceding.
The contemplated improvement is spoken of as the “first thing
of the Kind that has been attempted on the Continent.” The advertisement
promised that the straightening of the road would lop 12 to 15 miles
off the New York-Philadelphia route and would make the roads more passable
in winter time. 29
29 The
New York Journal or General Advertiser, December
18, 1766; New Jersey Archives, Vol. XXV, p. 256.
Nothing came of the whole project in the end, for
Governor Franklin, speaking before the Assembly in 1768 of this attempt
to shorten the roads, said that “even those which lie between
the principal trading cities in North America are seldom passable without
danger or difficulty.” At about this time, stages travelled the
route three times a week, advertising that the trip would be made in
one and a half days. In practice, however, two days were required. The
mails, carried on horseback, travelled at a faster rate.
THE NEW BRUNSWICK-TRENTON ROAD
In this period, the New Brunswick-Trenton road was considered the main
thoroughfare from New York to Pennsylvania. Five or six miles south of
the Raritan River a road branched off from this highway and, sweeping
away to the east, arrived at Burlington. The proprietors ran this road
as an opposition road to the Trenton route in the hope of drawing people
and trade to the seat of their government. As early as 1700, however,
it was clear that the Brunswick-Trenton road was in greater favor with
those travelling between New York and Philadelphia.
Shortly before the Revolution a road
was opened leading from Trenton “to Pond Run Bridge and Allentown,”
as the road is designated upon a map drawn in 1789. This road was known
as the road to Sandtown, and along it marched Washington’s troops
on their way to Princeton after the second Battle of Trenton. Hamilton
Avenue follows the line of this road.
At the time of the Revolution, that
part of the King’s Highway below the Assunpink was known as Broad
Street, Nottingham, or the road to Crosswicks. This highway is the South
Broad Street of today, except for a slight shifting of the line of the
street made when the Delaware and Raritan Canal was dug. At that time
the road was shifted east for a short distance along its route. The
road to Bloomsbury ran from this road down along the present line of
Market Street, turning sharply to the left upon reaching the lodge-keeper’s
gate at the Bloomsbury tract, and then following the course of what
is Union Street today.
What we know as Ferry Street was precisely
the road leading from Crosswicks Road to Trenton Ferry. About 650 feet
down along the line of this road, one came upon the road to Lamberton,
running off the Ferry road to the left and down to the projected town
of Lamberton.
PUBLIC HIGHWAYS
The most important statute in Colonial
days upon the subject of roads was passed March 11, 1774. It designated
all roads of four and six rods width as public highways, and made it
unlawful for anyone to alter these roads in any way. The election of
overseers and surveyors of the highways in each township was provided
for and their duties and powers set forth. The method to be pursued
in applying for the laying out of the new road was detailed, and each
inhabitant was required, upon the order of any overseer, to contribute
not less than one, nor more than three, days’ labor annually towards
the repair of the roads in his district. Such an inhabitant might send
an able-bodied substitute, and if he provided a cart and horse, these
were considered as equal to one man’s labor. The overseer was
to keep the roads in good repair and clear of obstacles and was to dig
necessary ditches and drains. Any person found removing any post, road-mark
or milestone already erected was liable to a £5 fine.
In 1775 the question arose as to what
overseer was to be held responsible for the “new Road . . . laid
out from Samuel Henry’s Mill to Maidenhead Road.” The surveyors
of Hopewell, Maidenhead and Trenton townships had just laid out this
road, whose course differed in several respects from the one laid out
in 1758. Mulberry Street, as has been noted, follows the line established
August 6, 1774. 30
In 1775 all the overseers joined in caring for this road, and £10
was voted for the purchase of timber for the repair of the roads. In
1776, the road was assigned to the “overseers of the Middle &
Rodgers Road,” who continued to attend to it until 1781.
30 Road
Records of Hunterdon County, Book I, p. 92.
The minutes of the township meeting in 1781 note
that William Harcourt was chosen “overseer of Penington Road.”
It was in this year, presumably, that the name “Rodgers Road”
was dropped and the name “Pennington” substituted. At the
meeting held in 1786 it was agreed that each part of the town “maintain
their own Road In Every Respect for the Ensuing Year.” In 1788
and 1789, £25 was voted for the repair of the roads; in 1790 £75
was needed. The money was ordered raised by a tax. At the annual meeting
held April 11, 1791, an overseer “for the Town Spot” was
chosen, and it was decided that thereafter roads in the district of
the “Town Spot” were to be repaired by means of a separate
tax, levied on the inhabitants of that district alone. £35 was
ordered raised in this manner.
THE RIVER ROAD
The River Road finds frequent mention
in the township minutes. It had two overseers, one to care for the “upper
part” and the other for the “lower part.” The road
ran from what is now Front and South Willow Streets, northward along
the line of Willow to West Hanover Street (then Quarry Street), out
along Hanover Street and past what used to be the estates of Rutherford
and Colonel Dickinson, and thence in a northwesterly course through
Trenton junction to Bear Tavern. In 1782 Second Street was extended
westward past Willow, and became, in that part, a four-rod road leading
to Beatty’s Ferry. In the fall of the next year, a forty-foot
road was opened from Pennington Road to Beatty’s Ferry. From Pennington
Road to about the point where the Feeder now crosses under Calhoun Street,
the road followed the present course of Calhoun Street (then Calhoun
Lane), but from that point on it curved away to the right and ran down
to the ferry landing.
At the beginning of the nineteenth
century, travel and cartage became so great that turnpike companies
were chartered in all sections of the East. The present Brunswick Pike
is the result of the chartering of the Trenton and New Brunswick Turnpike
Company on November 14, 1804. The incorporators were James Ewing, Joshua
Wright, John Neilson, James Schureman and Thomas Hill. The road was
to be four rods wide from Trenton to New Brunswick. Subscriptions were
two thousand shares, $100 par value, five dollars to be paid down on
each share upon subscribing. In 1807, the Princeton and Kingston Branch
Turnpike Company was incorporated. It ran along the line of Princeton
Avenue and up to Princeton, joining the old road at Kingston. In Revolutionary
days Beakes Lane ran along the line of Princeton Avenue, from the Five
Points site up to the Beakes plantation. The Pennington Road also became
a turnpike road early in the 1800’s as did the Allentown route.
The first turnpike to be chartered in Burlington County was the Bordentown
to Trenton route, November 24, 1808. Tolls were charged on all these
turnpikes, of course, but after a period of years the tolls were eliminated.
III. Stage Coaches
THE earliest method of land travel was by foot or
on horseback. Where there were goods to be carried, packhorses were
used. The roads, as we have just seen, were nothing more than paths.
A traveller, journeying from New York to Philadelphia, proceeded to
Elizabeth-town and followed the old Dutch road to New Brunswick, where
the river was forded at low water. From there he continued on in an
almost straight line to Trenton, where he and his horse forded the Delaware
just above the Falls. Later, when the paths were widened and took on
the semblance of roads, and ferries had been established along the river,
the stage coach came into existence and travel became a less uncomfortable
undertaking.
The earliest advertisement of a stage
line on record appeared in the American Weekly Mercury for September
19-26, 1723. The notice ran:
If any Person or Persons may have occasion to pass
or repass, or convey goods from Philadelphia to Trenton and backward,
their Goods may be secured at the House of John Wollard at Trentown,
in order for further Conveyance. Such Persons may enquire, or repair
to the House of the said John Wollard in Trentown by the Mill there,
or at the Crooked Billet in Philadelphia. Passengers may come, and Goods
may be convey'd from Trentown, every Monday or Tuesday, and from Philadelphia,
every Thursday or Friday. 31
31 American
Weekly Mercury, September 19-26, 1723; New
Jersey Archives, Vol. XI, p. 75.
William Atlee and Thomas Hooton went
into the stage business in 1738. Their notice appeared in the January
31-February 7, 1737-38 issue of the American Weekly Mercury:
To Accomodate the PUBLIC
There will be a STAGE WAGON set out from Trenton to Brunswick,
Twice a Week, and back again during next Summer: It will be fitted up
with Benches and Cover’d over so that Passengers may sit ,Easy
and Dry and Care will be taken to Deliver Goods and Messages safe. 32
32 American
Weekly Mercury, January 31-February 7, 1737-38;
New Jersey Archives, Vol. XI, p. 521.
The first trip was made on Monday, March 27, 1737-38,
the stage setting out from Atlee and Hooton’s in Trenton. The
stage ran every Monday and Thursday from Trenton, and every Tuesday
and Friday from New Brunswick. The charge was 2s. 6d. the passenger.
The Atlee and Hooton stage ran during
the summer of 1738 and was then discontinued. On April 10, 1740, the
stage was revived: “The Stage-Waggon will be continued and go
twice a Week certain, from Trenton Ferry every Monday
and Thursday, and from Brunswick back again every Tuesday
and Friday, during the Summer.”
33 The “stage-waggon” used was a covered one,
and the rate per passenger the same as before. Goods were carried at
2s. the hundred-weight. William Atlee and Joseph Yeates were the owners.
33 Pennsylvania
Gazette, April 10, 1740; New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XII, p. 21.
It will be noted that the Atlee stage
ran only during the summer season. It was well-nigh impossible to traverse
the roads during the winter or spring because of their miry condition
or the accumulation of snow and ice. It was not until a quarter of a
century later that the winter stage line was to put in its appearance.
At this time Joseph Borden of Bordentown announced the opening of his
line of stage wagons “between Perth-Amboy and Bordens-town,”
and a line of stage boats between Bordentown and Philadelphia. Borden
was intent upon cutting off his growing rival, Trenton. The Trenton
lines, like the Trenton-Brunswick road, were too popular with the travellers
to be affected; in the end they won out in the uneven struggle for patronage.
Upon William Atlee’s death, his
widow and administratrix, Jane, advertised his “Waggon with five
Horses, and Appurtenances, well fitted for a Stage-Waggon, a Servant
Man’s Time, for three Years, being us’d to drive said Waggon
. . .” for sale. 34
William Willson, of New Brunswick, bought the wagon and reestablished
the stage route which Atlee had so successfully managed. The stage ran
twice a week as before, and on the same days. Persons sending goods
from Philadelphia were asked to “direct them to the care of Thomas
Hutton in Trenton, and those from New-York to William Willson in New-Brunswick,
where care shall be taken to forward them speedily and in good Order.”
35
34 Pennsylvania
Gazette, July 7, 1744; New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XII, p. 224.
35 Pennsylvania
Journal, July 7, 1744; New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XII, p. 229.
In 1753, Andrew Ramsay, of Long Island
Ferry, took over the Trenton Ferry and announced that he would open
a stage line between New Brunswick and Trenton and a stage boat service
between Trenton and Philadelphia. 36
He promised to give notice of the days on which his stage would run,
but no further announcement of his stage schedule is to be found. In
all probability, the stage never ran.
36 New
York Gazette or Weekly Post Boy, June 4, 1753
; New Jersey Archives, Vol. XIX, p. 265.
A NEW YORK-PHILADELPHIA
STAGE LINE
A Philadelphia to New York stage line, running via
Trenton and Perth Amboy and covering the distance in three days, was
announced in 1756. This was the first through service between these
two large cities of the eastern coast. John Butler of Philadelphia was
the owner. 37 The trip was made in
three stages, passengers and goods out of Philadelphia being shifted
to another stage at the house of Nathaniel Parker at Trenton Ferry,
and again at New Brunswick, and yet again at the Blazing Star Ferry
at Amboy, where they were transferred to a stage boat which ran to Powle’s
Hook on the New York side. In 1757 this stage ran twice a week, setting
out from Philadelphia on Tuesdays and Fridays. 38
37 The
Pennsylvania Journal, November 18, 1756; New
Jersey Archives, Vol. XX, p. 78.
38 Pennsylvania
Gazette, June 16, 1757; New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XX, p. 116.
Jonathan Biles of Philadelphia established yet another
Philadelphia to New York stage service in 1763. His stage wagons left
Philadelphia every Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday, arriving at
Trenton Ferry the same day. There the goods and passengers were transferred
to other stage wagons to be carried to Brunswick, and from thence to
Elizabeth-town or Amboy, as the passenger might choose. After October
1 and during the winter, the stage ran only on Mondays and Thursdays.
39
39 Pennsylvania
Gazette, August 18, 1763; New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XXIV, P. 223.
In 1764, John Barnhill of Philadelphia
purchased Biles’s stage business and equipment and continued the
stage wagon service between Philadelphia and Trenton Ferry. The stage
set out for Trenton every Monday and Thursday. 40
40 Pennsylvania
Gazette, June 7, 1764; New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XXIV, P. 376.
Another Powle’s Hook-Philadelphia
stage appeared on the scene in 1765, and was operated by John Mersereau,
William Richards, John Downey and John Barnwell. The stage left Philadelphia
for Trenton every Monday and Thursday; the next day passengers were
carried forward to New Brunswick by another stage. On the third day
they were conveyed from that place to the Blazing Star Ferry in yet
another wagon, taking the stage boat for Powle’s Hook at once
upon arrival at that point. Barnwell had charge of the Philadelphia-Trenton
run. The stage from Powle’s Hook to Philadelphia started out every
Wednesday and Saturday. The charge was 4s. the passenger for each stage,
or 12s. for the entire trip. Goods were carried at the rate of 3s. 6d.
per hundred-weight.
In 1766, Barnhill, who had been running
his Philadelphia-Trenton stage for two years, opened a stage line from
Philadelphia to New York, announcing that his “flying machine”
would perform the journey in two days from April 14 to November 14,
and in three days during the other five months of the year. The stage
set out from Philadelphia every Monday and Thursday “punctually
at sun-rise,” arriving at Princeton the same night. There the
passengers were taken up by John Masherew, who conveyed them to the
Blazing Star Ferry the next day while Barnhill returned to Philadelphia.
The charge was 10s. for each stage, or 20s. for the entire distance,
ferriage free. The rate per mile for persons travelling only a part
of a stage was 3d. The wagon seats of the Barnhill stage were set on
springs - an especial comfort in those days of travel.
41 The stage line prospered; a notice in the New York Gazette or Weekly
Post Boy of May 9, 1768, announced that:
There will be but two Waggons, but four sets of
fresh Horses, so it will be very safe for any Person to send Goods,
as there are but two Drivers; they may exchange their Goods without
any Mistake. Persons may now go from New York to Philadelphia, .and
back again in five Days, and remain in Philadelphia two Nights and one
Day to do their Business in: The Public may be assured that the Road
is much the shortest than any other to Philadelphia . . . .
41 Pennsylvania
Journal, February 13, 1766; New Jersey
Archives, Vol. XXV, p. 25.
Abraham Skilman set out to duplicate Barnhill’s
achievement in 1770. His route was the usual Powle’s Hook-Philadelphia
route, covered in two days “with a good neat covered WAGGON and
Horses suitable.” The rates were the same as Barnhill’s,
but the stage ran but once a week, setting out from Philadelphia every
Friday morning, with Skilman driving the entire way. To attract patronage,
Skilman advertised that “he would never chuse to carry above 8
Passengers at a Time, though there might be Room for 1 or 2 more on
Occasion . . . .” 42
Barnhill saw through Skilman’s attempt to establish an opposition
line, and circulated an advertisement to that effect in Philadelphia,
adding that Skilman’s line would not, as did his, run in the winter.
Skilman immediately gave the lie to this statement, answering that his
stage would run both in winter and summer, as advertised, and that opposition
on his part was impossible, since his stage left Philadelphia a day
later (Friday) than Barnhill’s.” 43
42 New
York Gazette or Weekly Post Boy, May 28, 1770;
New Jersey Archives, Vol. XXVII, p. 163.
43 Pennsylvania
Gazette, August 8, 1771; New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XXVII, pp. 537-8.
“FLYING MACHINES”
In 1772 John Mersereau (the Masherew in charge of
the Blazing Star Ferry end of Barnhill’s stage, sometimes called
Mercerow, as in Skilman’s answer to Barnhill, above) made the
startling announcement that his “flying machine” would cover
the New York-Philadelphia route in a day and a half, setting out from
Powle’s Hook every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. From November
1 to May 1 the trip was to take two days.
44 As before, Barnhill was in charge of the Philadelphia
end of the run. The stage had been running on a two-day schedule.
45
44 New
York Gazette or Weekly Post Boy, January 13,
1772 ; New Jersey Archives, Vol. XXVIII, p. 23.
45 The
New York Gazette or Weekly Post-Boy, January
14, 1771 ; New Jersey Archives, Vol. XXVII, p. 341.
Joseph Hart of Philadelphia, announced
in July 1772 that his “PHILADELPHIA STAGE COACH, a very pleasant,
easy and delightful Carriage,” running between Philadelphia and
New York, was about to open. 46 The fare
was 30s. - l0s. more than Barnhill and Mercereau charged. The coach,
equipped to carry “very commodiously eight persons,” set
out f rom Philadelphia on Tuesdays, making the trip in two days and
returning from Powle’s Hook on Fridays.
47
46 Pennsylvania
Chronicle, July 13-20, 1772; New Jersey
Archives, Vol. XXVIII, p. 189.
47 New
York Gazette or Weekly Mercury, July 27, 1772
; New Jersey Archives, Vol. XXVIII, p. 204.
The next year Charles Bessnot (Bessonett,
in other advertisements) established a Philadelphia-New York stage which
set out from Philadelphia before dawn every Tuesday and Friday, making
the trip in two days. Passengers changed at Princeton. The fare was
$4 the passenger, half to be paid down at the time his name was entered
on the books for the trip. Outside passengers were carried for 20s.,
and baggage weighing one stone or less was carried free. The charge
was 2d. for every pound over.
48
48 Pennsylvania
Journal, April 7, 1773 ; New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XXVIII, p. 481.
At this time the Philadelphia-New York route ran
out of Philadelphia to Bristol and on to the Pennsylvania side of Trenton
Ferry. The crossing was made on the large, flat ferry boats, and the
trip continued on the other side up the Ferry Road to the Eagle Hotel,
located on the northwest corner of what is now Ferry and South Broad
Streets. There the stage turned left and proceeded along the Crosswicks
Road, across the Assunpink bridge and up Queen Street to the Old York
Road, passing through Maidenhead, “Prince-Town,” Kingston,
Brunswick, Elizabeth and Newark to Powle’s Hook.
POSTAL SERVICE
While the stages competed with one
another in trying to establish better time along the New York-Philadelphia
route, the mail enjoyed a swifter service than ever the passengers.
The first general postal service for the American Colonies was established
by royal patent granted February 17, 1691, appointing Thomas Neale,
Esq., of England, as its head, commissioned with authority to establish
postoffices and post=routes “within the King’s Colony and
plantations in America.” It was Neale who appointed Colonel John
Hamilton, son of Governor Andrew Hamilton of New Jersey, deputy postmaster-general,
about 1694. (The New York Gazette for July 31, 1732, speaks of
the General Postoffice as having been established about thirty-eight
years previously by Colonel Hamilton.) Some effort must have been made
to have the mails go through to their destination on a regular schedule,
but speed could hardly have been a factor in the days when roads were
roads in name only. The post frequently was a week late because of the
condition of the roads or the state of the weather.
The first postal route in this section
was out of Philadelphia to Burlington, Amboy and New York. In 1720 the
post left Philadelphia every Friday, arriving at New York Sunday night.
It was not unusual for the post to be from one to three days late. Even
this was an improvement over the service of a score of years before,
when the mail, on one occasion, was a week behind, and this in the pleasant
month of May.
The mails continued to run once a week
between New York and Philadelphia until 1754, when Benjamin Franklin
became superintendent of the mails and improved the postal service.
In October of that year it was announced that the mails would leave
the two cities three times a week regularly, at eight in the morning,
and arrive at their destination on the next day at five in the afternoon.
Certainly this 33-hour service was far speedier than the stage schedule.
After Christmas the postal service was maintained regularly once a week.
Improvements in the speed and handling
of the post went on apace, until in 1764 it was announced that the mail
would leave Philadelphia and New York every alternate day and go through
in 24 hours or less. The Revolution, of course, disrupted this schedule,
but after the war it probably returned to its former efficiency until
the railroads came to improve it immeasurably. Concerning the movement
of the mails in the post-Revolutionary period, little information is
to be had.
All during this time the mail was carried
by post riders; any other means of transporting the mails could never
have achieved the swiftness with which letters were carried between
New York and Philadelphia. Small parcels were carried by the stage and
not by the post riders. With the coming of better roads at the turn
of the century, the mail coach came into being. The route commonly followed
out of Philadelphia led along the stage route to Trenton Ferry, through
Trenton and then up to New Brunswick along the old King’s Highway.
When Trenton Ferry was discontinued, the coaches went by way of the
upper ferry for a while. Soon after they returned to the old route and
crossed the river by way of the newly built bridge in South Trenton.
The mail was carried in a four-horse
stage coach, driven by the best driver obtainable. Beside him on the
front seat sat a bugler, and on the booth behind stood a guardsman with
a brace of pistols in his belt. On entering Trenton by way of the lower
bridge, the bugler would strike up a patriotic air, usually “Yankee
Doodle” or “Hail Columbia.” (Some contemporaries maintain
that the tune was the same in and out of season, and served as a warning
for the children and people in the street to make way for the swift-moving
stage.) Fresh horses were hitched up at Mrs. Shuff’s tavern. In
1811, mail coaches leaving New York or Philadelphia at 2 p.m. arrived
at their destination at six the next morning. This was the best schedule
ever achieved by the mail stages.
POST-REVOLUTIONARY
STAGES
The stages, like the mails, found trouble in maintaining
any sort of schedule during the Revolutionary days and for some time
after. With the new government established and times somewhat more settled
than they had been for a long time, the stages came back into prominence
again. The “flying machines,” a term which seems to have
been applied to almost every sort of a stage coach, were uncomfortable
and ungainly vehicles. A German traveller passing through this section
in 1788 described them as
. . . large wooden carts, light to be sure, but
neither convenient nor of neat appearance. They carry from ten to twelve
passengers with luggage, are drawn by four horses only, and go very
fast. The charge for this journey [New York to Philadelphia] is five
to six Spanish dollars the passenger.
In April 1795 we
find Peter Howell advertising a “two-horse coachee,” which
left Trenton for Philadelphia every Wednesday and Saturday at 11 a.m.
The fare per passenger was 12s. 6d. and 14 pounds of baggage was allowed.
In the Federalist of July 8, 1800, John C. Hummel and Joseph
Vandergrift announced that they would run a line of stage coaches between
Trenton and Philadelphia, which would leave Trenton from the Sign of
the New Jersey Dragon. Early the next year, Hummel notified the public
that the “Trenton Accomodation Stage,” as he called it,
was not discontinued, but ran every day except Sunday, from his house,
the Union Inn in Trenton.
49 A short two months later, we find Thomas Porter running
a “new stage” between Trenton and Philadelphia, leaving
Trenton from John C. Hummel’s tavern. Apparently he had taken
over Hummel’s line. The stage left Trenton on Tuesdays, Thursdays
and Saturdays, and Philadelphia (from John Carpenter’s) on Mondays,
Wednesdays and Fridays, during the summer season. Porter offered the
rather unique service of a coachee and horses “to go to any part
of the Continent.” 50
A week later Joseph Vandergrift went back into the stage business and
set up his stage office next door to the Indian Queen Tavern. His coaches
ran daily from Trenton and Philadelphia.
51
49 Federalist,
February 28, 1801.
50 ibid.,
April 13, 1801.
51 ibid.,
April 21, 1801.
On June 23, 1801, Samuel Gordon and Samuel Coward
started a line of stage coaches between Trenton and Long Branch, running
from the City Hotel, corner Warren and Bank Streets, via Allentown and
Monmouth Court House. 52
52 ibid.,
June 23, 1801.
Yet another Trenton-Philadelphia stage line was established
in 1802. Peter Probasco and John Dean were its owners, and their coaches
traversed the route every day of the week, Sundays excepted. The stage
office was located two doors above the Indian Queen. In 1805 came the
Trenton and Philadelphia Line, managed and owned by John Mannington
and Aseph Stowell, whose stage office was next door to the City Bank.
53 This line, unlike many of its competitors, ran for
some time. In 1807 we find Mannington advertising this same coach service;
the “coachee stages” left Philadelphia daily, except on
Sunday, at 8 a.m., and arrived in Trenton in time for dinner at the
owner’s tavern, which was also the stage office mentioned above.
The fare was one dollar and fifty cents one way. Yet another Philadelphia
line of stages was set up in 1814 by John Lafaucherie and G. H. Vanderveer.
54 The coaches ran from Fish’s tavern (Indian King
Tavern), Trenton, stopped for passengers at Vandergrift’s tavern
in Lamberton, and proceeded to the Sign of the Sorrel Horse in Philadelphia.
This was a daily service.
53
ibid., September 16,1805.
54 ibid.,
January 24, 1814.
During this period, as has been indicated
above, the steamboat established itself as an accepted mode of travel
on the Delaware. Stage owners ran their conveyances down to the landing
to discharge and take on passengers. In 1814, for example, we find John
Lafasherie (sic), John Gulick and Robert Letson announcing that their
steamboat stages continue to run from the Philadelphia steamboat to
New York every Monday and Friday, the hour of departure being postponed
until the arrival of the boat from Philadelphia.
55 The next year we find the announcement of the Trenton
and Philadelphia stage, owned by Lafaucherie himself, stating that the
line will run daily between Trenton and Philadelphia as soon as the
steamboats stop sailing.
56 The coaches stopped for passengers at John Voorhees’
Sign of the Steamboat hotel in Bloomsbury, which was located at what
is now the corner of Warren and Bridge Streets.
55 ibid.,
April 17, 1814.
56 ibid.,
November 27, 1815.
Lafaucherie continued an active figure
in local stage-line circles for many years. In 1819 we find him in partnership
with Isaac Merriam and Lewis Thompson, maintaining a daily stage service
between this city and Philadelphia. The stages set forth from John Anderson’s
inn, the Rising Sun, and called for passengers at the various inns in
Trenton along the way. Connections were made with the steamboat Philadelphia,
at Bloomsbury Wharf. The stages were called by the polite name of “coach-carriages.”
57
In 1822, Lafaucherie and Merriam, always enterprising,
made an agreement with the proprietors of the steamboat Philadelphia,
whereby they were enabled to give all steamboat passengers free stage
service between the Trenton inns and the boat in Bloomsbury.
58 Thus we find these two partners engaging in a Philadelphia
stage service and a steamboat stage line at the same time. The line
to Philadelphia was apparently called the Citizen’s Line of stages.
57 Federalist,
January 5, 1819.
58 ibid.,
April 2, 1822.
The stage coaches of this time carried
not only passengers and baggage, but also mail for any one who would
place confidence in the owners of the conveyances. Lafaucherie and Merriam
offered to carry mail in their Philadelphia coaches. 59
In 1827, Joseph I. Thompson
carried both mail and passengers on his mail stage between Trenton and
New Brunswick. The stage ran daily, except Sundays, leaving Trenton
at eight in the morning, changing horses at Princeton and arriving at
Brunswick in short order. The fare was one dollar. C. H. Vanderveer
ran a line of mail stages to New Brunswick the next year, in competition
with Thompson’s line.
59 ibid.,
August 19, 1822.
A new stage route was established in
1830 when J. W. and W. C. Dusenberry, of Belvidere, set up the Trenton-Belvidere
line of mail stages. Contemporary Trentonians recall the four-horse
coaches that made daily trips to Belvidere before the coming of the
railroad. The route of the stage line led out of West State Street.
This account of the stages, arranged chronologically,
will give one a fair idea of the development of stage-coach transportation
in this section. The main highways were well travelled, as many as five
competing lines traversing them in certain periods. The coaches never
achieved a real comfort and travellers from the Continent, accustomed
to a smoother and older service, found much to criticize in these American
conveyances. Schedules were not regular until after 1800; the roads
remained more or less unimproved until that period also. Competing stage
lines looked more to cutting down the running time between New York,
Trenton and Philadelphia as a measure of success than to watching after
the comfort of their passengers. With the passing of time, however,
inns sprang up along the main routes, the roads were improved, the more
comfortable coaches and “coach-carriages” replaced the “flying
machines” which had been built with an eye for speed only. A greater
measure of safety attended the swifter schedules, so that by the time
that the railroads appeared on the scene, stage-coach travel in this
vicinity had been developed to a high degree. The steamboats and the
trains offered far better facilities for travel, however, so that after
1820 stage travel began its gradual, though sure and steady, decline.
With the ‘4o’s, the stages had quite disappeared.
IV. Ferries
THE ferries that were established at Trenton, like
the bridges which were to replace them, must be considered as extensions
of the highways. Travellers hastening across New Jersey toward Philadelphia,
or coming from Pennsylvania into our State, were faced with the problem
of getting across the Delaware. Though small boats might be used to
carry the travellers across, there was no way in which they might have
transported their carriages and horses, or bulky articles.
TRENT’S FERRY
In 1725, James Trent, eldest son of William Trent,
petitioned William Burnet, governor of the Province, for the right to
maintain a ferry at Trenton Falls. By the law of England, the right
of ferriage was, like the right to conduct a fair or market, a privilege
which had its origin in a statute or royal grant. The patent for a ferry
was granted to James Trent on February 7, 1726, and recited among other
reasons 60
for the grant that James Trent’s father, William Trent, had gone
to much expense in establishing Trent Town and further sets forth the
need for such ferry as follows:
Travellers to and from New York and Philadelphia
have of late usually gone through Trenton aforesaid, on their way where
they are obliged to cross the River Delaware sometimes by riding the
same when it is fordable and other times by hiring of boats from those
who are not under obligation of letting them or of attendance and keeping
convenient boats for transportation of goods and passengers; that it
would be a great security and convenience to travellers that a regular
ferry or ferries be erected and kept for carrying of travellers and
goods over the Delaware River aforesaid, near to said Town of Trent
Town which our loving subject James Trent is willing to undertake upon
our granting to him and his heirs the sole liberty of keeping the same
. . . .
60 See
pp. 48-9, Chap. 1, above.
Trent immediately established a ferry at what is
now the foot of Ferry Street. This ferry was known at various times
as the “Trenton Ferry,” the “Old Ferry,” the
“Middle Ferry” and also as the “Upper Ferry.”
Trenton Ferry had a checkered existence.
Often there are lapses in its history which hint at its discontinuance,
but always it was revived by some enterprising newcomer. Thus in 1753
we find one, Andrew Ramsay, “late of Long Island Ferry,”
announcing that the Trenton Ferry is revived under his management. Ramsay
was a lessee of the ferry right under Robert Lettis Hooper, the then
owner. The ferry was well patronized by stage coaches on the New York-Philadelphia
run and by other travellers having occasion to cross the river at Trenton.
In 1753 a number of French soldiers, deserters from the Mississippi
expedition, passed over the ferry. The next year George Burns, of New
York, advertised that he had opened a house of entertainment at the
ferry, a sign that it enjoyed good patronage.
Hooper advertised the ferry, along
with his mills, buildings and land, for sale in January, 1765.61
The notice brought no buyers, as appears from another
advertisement in the Pennsylvania Chronicle of May 28-June 4,
1770, offering the same properties for sale. Shortly after this, Daniel
W. Coxe bought the ferry, for in the Pennsylvania Gazette for
October 4, 1770, he announces that “Trenton Ferry, Tavern and
premises” are to let, and that he has “nearly compleated
an entire new wharf for the accomodation of the Ferry.”62
61 Pennsylvania
Gazette, January 17, 1765; New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XXIV, p. 471.
62 Ferries
at this time were closely regulated by the Provincial government. By
an Act of December 6, 1769, those maintaining ferries were always to
keep their equipment in good order, with sufficient hands to attend
the ferry, and were not to deny, nor unnecessarily delay, the speedy
carrying over of passengers, their goods and carriages, under penalty
of a 20s. fine for each offense. Unreasonable ferriages were not allowed.
The next Assembly was to have established a fixed scale of ferry rates,
but it seems that this was not done.
It was Rensselaer Williams who answered
Coxe’s advertisement for a lessee of the ferry patent. On November
22, 1773, Williams announced the removal of his Royal Oak Inn to Trenton
Ferry, He and Patrick Colvin advertised in the Pennsylvania Gazette
of March 30, 1774, announcing themselves as eager to satisfy the public,
“even by a sacrifice of their own interest, and at a rate really
not to be afforded,” and ready to “ferry all persons, horses,
carriages, etc., upon the same terms, and as low a rate and price as
any ferry within the distance of four miles on the river.” They
claimed their ferry to be more convenient and “nearer by a considerable
distance than the Ferry below, and narrower by upwards of one hundred
yards.” The appeal for the custom of the public was also made
in the New York papers. Apparently, Elijah Bond, who had established
“the Ferry below” (to which reference will be made), was
giving the Trenton Ferry stiff competition. By Christmas, 1774, Coxe
was advertising Trenton Ferry “to be lett from the first of next
March”; Williams, seemingly, hadn’t been able to meet Bond’s
challenge.
The year 1776 saw Coxe without a lessee
for his ferry patent. In the Pennsylvania Gazette of January
3, 1776, he announces “Trenton Ferry and Plantation whereupon
Mr. Rensellaer Williams now lives, to be LETT for one or more years,
together with the TAVERN, Farm, etc . . . .” In December of the
same year, the Pennsylvania Evening Post carried an item announcing
that “the elegant house of Daniel Coxe, Esquire, at Trenton Ferry,”
had been burned by the British. This house was probably situated on
Bloomsbury farm, and its destruction would seem to have been wholly
accidental, in view of the fact that Coxe was a counsellor and friend
of the British army.
BOND’S FERRY
At about this time Rensselaer Williams,
who had continued to conduct the tavern at Trenton Ferry, removed to
the center of town, where he reopened his “Royal Oak” in
the house of Abraham Cottnam, on the northeast corner of Queen and Third
Streets. After him, Thomas Janney came to live at “Trenton Old
Ferry,” as it was then called. In the Pennsylvania Gazette
of May 8, 1776, Janney sets forth the advantages of the ferry which
he had just leased, claiming it to be a mile nearer to Philadelphia
than the Bond Ferry below. Thomas Harvey, who had just taken over that
ferry, rushed to its defense, advertising that the difference in distance
in favor of the Old Ferry was a scant half-mile and sixty rood. He announced,
furthermore, that he had “provided a more commodious boat than
has ever been heretofore at either Ferry” and that it was he who
had been “the sole cause of lowering the Ferriage more than a
third of the former price, which is a great saving to the public.”
The ferry thus advertised by Thomas
Harvey had been established by Elijah Bond in June 1773. It was two
miles below Trenton and about a mile below the Trenton Ferry owned by
Coxe. The landing was just below the present site of Riverview Cemetery.
The Pennsylvania end was owned by John Thornton. In advertising the
ferry, Bond advanced in its favor its remoteness from the Falls, thus
insuring a freedom from the rapidity of the stream and the rocks further
upstream. He emphasized, also, the absence of the many shallops which
one found at Trenton Ferry and which obstructed the landing of the ferry
boats there. The smooth landings and good road leading to the ferry
were also mentioned. The rates of ferriage announced were:
Footman,
3d.; Man and Horse, 6d.; Horse and Chair, 1s. 6d.; Chair and two Horses,
2s.; 4-wheeled Carriage with two Horses, 3s.; with four Horses, 4s.
; with five Horses, 5s. ; Cattle per head, 6d. ; Sheep and Calves, 1
1/2d. per head.
Bond’s ferry, because of its low rates and
natural advantages, pressed Coxe’s ferry hard for patronage. In
1773, Courtland Skinner, the attorney-general of the Province, presented
his memorial to Governor William Franklin, asking permission (as was
required by the laws of the Colony) to file an information in the nature
of a quo warranto against Elijah Bond for usurping the prerogative of
the Crown in “erecting a public ferry in the province of Nottingham
in the County of Burlington, without any license or grant for that purpose.”
There is no indication of the permission ever having been given or the
information having been filed.
Thomas Harvey took
over the Bond Ferry in 1776. It was by his ferry that the American troops
under General James Ewing had planned to cross on Christmas night, 1776,
to join Washington in a concerted attack upon the Hessians. Many writers
on the Battle of Trenton have considered Trenton Ferry as the place
chosen for the crossing, but Stryker questions this. The movements of
the troops further down the river would be far less open to observation
by the Hessians than would a movement at Trenton Ferry. There is also
the consideration that Daniel Coxe, the owner of this latter ferry,
was notoriously in sympathy with the British.
From Harvey’s hands, Bond’s
ferry passed into the ownership of Major William Trent, a son of Colonel
William Trent, who advertised the ferry and adjacent lands and buildings
for sale. 63 At this period the ferry was known as the Continental
Ferry, i.e., the ferry designated by the quartermaster department as
the one by which men in active army service might pass at a reduced
rate of ferriage. In January 1781, the Legislature of the State set
this rate at one-third the usual ferriage.
63 New
Jersey Gazette, .September 16, 1778; New
Jersey Archives, 2nd Ser., Vol. II, p. 429.
In 1779, the property of Daniel Coxe was confiscated
under a judgment rendered in favor of the State of New Jersey on an
inquisition found against him for his Tory connections. Accordingly,
John Butler and Joseph Borden, commissioners of forfeited estates for
Burlington County, advertised the ferry for sale.
64 The sale was
to be held on April 10. Hugh Runyan bought in the ferry patent and 496
acres of land.
64 New
Jersey Gazette, March 3, 1779; New Jersey
Archives, 2nd Ser., Vol. III, p. 111.
In June of the same year, the Trenton
Ferry, or, as it was confusingly called, the “Upper Ferry,”
was made the Continental Ferry. On September 25, 1780, however, Colonel
Samuel Miles, deputy quartermaster for the State of Pennsylvania, and
Colonel John Neilson, deputy quartermaster for the State of New Jersey,
advertised that inhabitants on both sides of the river, contiguous to
the Continental Ferry, attend them on October 9 at stated places that
they might “consult with such of the said inhabitants as shall
attend . . . whether it will conduce more to the public interest to
continue the continental ferry where it now is, or have it removed down
the river where it was formerly kept.” The result was that the
Continental Ferry was removed to the old Bond Ferry. But in May 30,
1781, the deputy quartermaster of New Jersey was announcing that the
Continental Ferry, after June 7, could be located at the Upper (i.e.,
Trenton) Ferry.
DESCRIPTION OF THE FERRIES
The ferries of this time employed flat-bottomed,
low-sided boats like scows, for the transportation of travellers, carriages
and goods. Perhaps a boat resembling the Durham boat was also used;
we know that they were used further up the river. Although some ferries
elsewhere effected the crossing by means of a cable, or rope, sliding
along an overhead cable or wire strung from shore to shore, Trenton
ferries used long poles, and some of them a sail, to negotiate the passage.
The Trenton ferries seem to have been as safe as any others in the East,
and quite as well patronized, but there were those who expressed dissatisfaction
with them. The Duc de la Rochefoucauld, writing in his Travels in
1795-97, speaks of the ferry “a quarter of a mile beyond Trenton
. . . which, though ten stage coaches daily pass in it, is such that
it would be reckoned a very bad ferry in Europe.” John Bernard,
writing in 1797, mentions a crossing in the ferry at Trenton “in
one of those flat-bottomed, low-sided Dutch floats called scows”
and relates how the horses, frightened by the sudden flapping of the
square sail, jumped overboard. A tragedy was barely averted, unlike
twenty years before when a similar incident occurred. A Traveller’s
Directory of the period, however, tells of five four-horse stages
between Philadelphia and New York “besides a great number of private
carriages, chaises, horses, etc.,” using the ferry boats and making
the trip “with the greatest safety from shore to shore, by means
of poles.”
Who conducted the Trenton Ferry after
Runyan bought it is unknown. In 1797 we find P. Howell and Amos Howell
informing the public that the Trenton Old Ferry has been kept by them
for some time past and is still maintained by them.65
In 1803 Amos Howell was still at this ferry, now called the “Middle
Ferry,” as appears from a notice inserted in the Federalist
of July 18, 1803. In 1804, the Delaware bridge was built and the doom
of the Old Trenton Ferry sealed. The ferry-house was advertised for
sale 66 in 1805,
along with other dwellings and lots.
65 Gazette
and Advertiser, August 15, 1797.
66 Federalist,
October 14, 1805.
The Gazette and Advertiser of July 11, 1797,
carries a notice by Peter Hunt and Samuel Ivins that they “have
established a new Ferry at Lamberton, provided with good and new boats.”
In 1799 67
they announce that they have taken the Lamberton ferry “into their
own hands again,” which would seem to indicate that for a time
the ferry had either been discontinued or managed by other owners. The
Federalist of November 25, 1800, carries the notice of a sale
of thirty lots along the Delaware, between Trenton and Lamberton, to
be sold “at the Ferry House kept by Samuel Harris.” It would
seem that the ferry house referred to was the one at Lamberton Ferry,
the “Middle Ferry” being managed by the Howells. With the
building of the bridge in 1804, Lamberton Ferry was advertised for rent
for one or more years; after that it disappears from the scene, along
with the Trenton Ferry.
67 ibid.,
March 18.
THE BEATTY FERRY
There was no ferry above the Falls
early in the eighteenth century, for in 1732 a notice in the July 24-31
issue of the Pennsylvania Gazette mentions one Warren Barr as
the person who “formerly kept the Ferry next above Delaware Falls,
on the Jersey side.” This ferry was located below the present
Yardley bridge. It is not until the time of the Revolution that we find
mention of a ferry nearer to the Falls than the one just mentioned.
It was George Beatty who maintained a ferry with a landing just above
where the waste weir is now located. A road led down from Pennington
Road, past Camptown, to the ferry, tracing the present line of Calhoun
Street as far as the River Road and at that point curving away to the
right and down to the ferry landing. State Street, in 1799, was described
in an ordinance as “the street running nearly parallel (to Greene
Street), leading towards . . . Beatty’s ferry.”
That George Beatty must have established
this ferry during the Revolution, or perhaps before that time, is indicated
by the fact that he put in a claim to Congress for compensation for
the damage done to his ferry during the war. Stryker mentions the ferry
in his Trenton One Hundred Years Ago. In November 1781, three
travellers, Samuel Hay, Robert Watson and James Dunlap, published a
puff for Beatty’s ferry in the Pennsylvania papers, detailing
how Patrick Colvin at Trenton Ferry had sought to overcharge them, and
how they had proceeded three-quarters of a mile up the river to where
John Burrows kept the Pennsylvania side of the ferry and been promptly
carried over at the regular rates. They recommend the ferry to the public
for their custom. In 1782 Burrows and Beatty announced that they had
“at length obtained a road laid out by authority, from the Bristol
Road to the New Trenton Ferry, the shortest way, a pleasant, sandy,
dry road at all seasons of the year.”
John Rutherford succeeded Beatty at the ferry. The
ferry above the Falls did not always stay in one place; its landings
on either shore were frequently shifted that the tide might be used
to best advantage and a smoother passage gained. In 1802, Rutherford
advertised his tavern and ferry house to let, giving as a reason that
the ferry was to be kept at another house. The new ferry was located
several rods above the old one. Joseph Kirkbride opened a new ferry
on the Pennsylvania side the same year, also a few rods above the old
one, “directly at the junction of the said river and the New Milford
Road.” 68
Boats started from his ferry landing on the Pennsylvania side and arrived
at John Rutherford’s new landing. In June 1802, Mahlon Reed announced
that he was attending the Rutherford Ferry, where the public mail carriages
and other stages crossed daily. Robert Perkins was in charge of the
Pennsylvania side. Reed advertised the ferry as the only one from the
city of Trenton over to the Pennsylvania shore.
68 Federalist,
May 11.
John Rutherford tried to sell his ferry in August
1806, together with the two ferry houses on either side of the river.
These seem to have been the old Beatty ferry houses. In 1820 69
Kirkbride, still proprietor of the Pennsylvania side of the ferry, sought
to dispose of his forty acres on which were the ferry house and ferry.
In 1822 Rutherford again tried to sell the ferry on both sides of the
river, but the property remained in his possession, for in partition
proceedings in Chancery in 1845 70
involving the property of the then deceased Rutherford, the ferry rights
and privileges are mentioned. William Crossly tenanted the Rutherford
ferry house in 1831 when it was damaged in a fire.71
69 ibid.,
March 6, 1820.
70 Rutherford
et al. vs. Rutherford, Enrolled in F. 3, p. 428.
71 Gazette,
May 14.
Soon after, the father of John Briest
72moved
into the ferry house. Samuel Crossley kept the hotel and ferry house
on the Pennsylvania side, and he and Briest operated the ferry. Briest
described the ferry boat as a large scow, which could carry two horses
and wagons, and passengers. It was propelled by poles, a man on each
side of the boat doing the pushing. Cattle, sheep and hogs, on their
way to the New York markets from the West, swam the river at the ferry,
a few beasts being put on the boat to serve as decoys. The lower bridge,
for some reason, was not considered a safe mode of transporting the
animals across the river. In the great freshet of 1842, the combination
ferry house and hotel was demolished, the ice jamming a hole in the
stone building and carrying one corner away. The old ferry house continued
standing for some time, becoming the resort of tramps and fishermen.
A stray tenant, in making a fire one day, set the roof and woodwork
on fire. Time and the elements tumbled into a heap the stones that remained
standing.
72 Mayor
of Trenton in 1871.
In 1826 the Federalist (June 12) announced
that the Lamberton team boat had begun a ferry service at what seems
to have been the site of the Lamberton ferry. No further mention of
this service is found.
V. Bridges
THE first stream in this vicinity to
be bridged was the Assunpink Creek. In the book of minutes of the Supreme
Court (1681-1709) we find that the township of Nottingham was presented
by the grand jury of Burlington in 1688 for “not making a sufficient
Bridge over the River Darion (Assunpink).” The court imposed a
fine of £20 on the inhabitants if the work was not speedily completed.
The bridge referred to in this minute is, of course, the structure which
was placed across the Assunpink at the point where South Broad Street
now crosses the creek. In the same record we find that in 1707
Samuel Oldal[e] complains that he was not paid for
building a bridge over Assunpink Creek, it is ordered that Theophilus
Phillips John Bainbridge John Clark & Capt. Hunt to assess persons
in Hopewell & Mai[denhead who have not subscribed].
References to the Assunpink bridge are few in number
and rather scattered. In 1750 extensive repairs were made to the bridge,
which was also known at that time as Trenton Bridge or the bridge at
Trent’s Mills. £35 was to be expended in the project and
Elijah Bond was to collect the assessments levied on the inhabitants
of the township. It seems that he collected more than he should, for
in 1758, Nathan Beakes and Joseph Decow were appointed to enquire:
. . . what money Thoms Barns has in his hands of
the Bridge money, Elijah Bond being collector, & make a Report at
ye next towns Meeting.
The account was not settled, for at the annual meeting
held March 13, 1759, it was ordered that:
. . . Aurther Howel & Nathan Beakes settle wth
Elijah Bond concerning a Ceartain Dublicate he ye said Bond Collected
in ye year 1750 for Repairing Trenton bridge for ye sum of £35
& ye bat . . . to receive in behalf of ye town.
The matter was finally closed in 1761, as one concludes
from the record of the township minute book:
Recd of Nathan Beakes £8 11s. 3d. being ye Settlement wth Elijah
Bond . . . .
In 1757 further repairs were necessary. At a meeting
of the surveyors and overseers of the highways, the justices and the
freeholders, it was agreed that:
. . , there shall be a Stone Piller Built in the
Line between Trenton & Nottingham for the Support of the Long Sleepers
of the bridge called Trenton bridge, and that the said Piller shall
be built not to Exceed four feet thick; and the Length to be twenty
feet; & that all other Repairs necessary shall be made.
It was agreed that the inhabitants of the township
be assessed £20 to meet the expense of the repair. The work was
faultily done, for at the annual meeting held March 13, 1759, it was
ordered that:
John Chambers who was Overseer when ye Pillar was
made of Trenton bridge And as there appears a Considerable mistake in
ye cast of ye said Pillar, to call all concern’d & Rectifie
ye Same - otherwise will be oblig’d to pay for such Mistake -
and Render an Acct of ye same at our next meeting.
About this time the General Assembly passed an Act
ordering a bridge to be built over the Assunpink in place of the old
one. This appears from an entry in the minute book of Trenton Township
under date of July 4, 1765, where the names of commissioners are listed
who were to report on the proportion of work done by Nottingham Township
toward the building of Assunpink bridge under an Act of Assembly “ordering
the bridge to be built forthwith.” They reported that Nottingham
had contributed £30 value of the work done. A later Act of the
General Assembly, passed in 1774, dealt more specifically with the proportion
of the expense to be borne by the townships adjoining the bridge. The
42nd section of this Act provided that:
. . . the Bridge leading from the Mills of the late Robert Lettis
Hooper to Trenton shall at all Times hereafter be repaired,
amended or rebuilt, two thirds Parts at the Expence and Charge of the
Inhabitants of the County of Hunterdon, and one third Part at
the Expence and Charge of the Inhabitants of the Township of Nottingham.
The width of small bridges on the highways of the
Province was to be at least 12 feet, and the bridges were:
. . . to be made of Logs, Poles, or Slabs, shall
have four Sleepers at least, and that the Logs, Poles, or Slabs covering
such Bridge shall be sufficiently squared, fixed dawn, and as closely
joined as the nature of such Materials will permit.
TWO OTHER EARLY BRIDGES
There were two other small bridges in Trenton in
the early days. One was over Huntley’s Run, and at a meeting of
the township held December 8, 1784, Alexander Calhoun presented an account
for work and materials expended on the bridge. The cost was £12
18s. 7d., and the overseers of the poor were ordered to pay it as soon
as they had a sufficient sum on hand. There was also a bridge over Petty’s
(Pettit’s) Run where it crossed King (Warren) Street. It was reported
to be in a state of disrepair at the township meeting held June 6, 1791.
John Riggs, Daniel Mershon and Joseph McCully were ordered to rebuild
it at a cost not to exceed £30, including a reasonable allowance
for their trouble. There was another bridge over Petty’s Run where
it crossed the line of Pennington Road. When this was erected is unknown,
although it must have been some time before the Revolution in view of
the amount of travel done along this route by the people of the town
and outlying districts.
About 1804 a bridge was built across
the Assunpink, connecting Warren Street with Bloomsbury Street below
the creek. In the Town Book, under date of October 1804, we find the
minutes of a meeting called to consider the propriety of raising money
to defray the expenses of filling up the abutments of “two Bridges
lately built across the Assunpink Creek near N. Burrowe’s Mills
& to make the necessary causeways . . . .” No money was voted
for the project. The Warren Street bridge was swept away by a freshet
in the Delaware, Thursday evening, February 21, 1822. The next morning
the bridge on Greene Street gave way, after having stood for more than
fifty years. It was over this bridge that Washington passed on his way
to New York to be inaugurated the first President of the United States.
FIRST BRIDGE
OVER THE DELAWARE
On March 3, 1798, the New Jersey Legislature,
in view of the fact that “a good and permanent bridge across the
river Delaware . . . would greatly contribute to facilitate the intercourse
between this State and the Southern States,” authorized John Beatty,
Peter Gordon and Aaron Howell, all of Trenton, and Philip Wagner, James
C. Fisher and Charles Biddle, of Philadelphia, to act as subscription
commissioners for the stock of the first bridge across the Delaware
at Trenton. Pennsylvania passed similar legislation on April 4 of the
same year. The charter was granted by New Jersey on August 16, 1803,
Pennsylvania granting like privileges. The building of the bridge was
begun in May 1804, and since it did not seem, for a while, that the
bridge would be finished within the time limited by the charter, the
time for completing the bridge was extended to March 3, 1812, by a supplementary
Act passed in Pennsylvania on April 2, 1804, New Jersey passed concurrent
legislation. The bridge was finished and opened for travel on January
30, 1806. The construction had cost $180,000.
|
|
Theodore Burr designed and built the
bridge, and General John Beatty was president of the bridge company.
The opening of the bridge was the occasion of a gala celebration and
elaborate exercises. 73 In its day the bridge was a nine days’ wonder,
travellers coming from all points to view this unique piece of engineering.
73 True
American, February 4, 1806.
DESCRIPTION OF THE BRIDGE
The bridge was 1,008 feet long, from the Jersey abutment to the Pennsylvania
one which rested on Delaware Works Island. Its width was 36 feet. The
superstructure of the bridge consisted of five wooden arches, respectively
203, 198, 161, 186 and 203 feet in the clear, each composed of five
great arched ribs rising from the chord in the proportion of 13 feet
to 100. These ribs were made of four-inch pine planks, a foot wide and
from 35 to 50 feet long, built up into a thick, laminated rib, three
feet wide. The relative placing of these ribs left two openings of 11
feet each in the center of the bridge for carriage ways, and two more,
each 4 feet 6 inches wide, on the sides for footwalks. The ribs were
spaced and bound together on the top circumference of the arches by
ties and diagonal braces, fastened to the ribs by bolts and screws at
intervals of 8 feet. The floor was suspended from the ties by perpendicular
iron rods, securely fastened in the wood. Wing arches and diagonal braces
were effectively used throughout to eliminate all motion between the
parts of the bridge, thus making it a rigid and solid structure.
The entire bridge was covered by a roof of cedar shingles, and was
enclosed at each end. Originally there were high and elaborate fronts,
both on the New Jersey and the Pennsylvania ends of the bridge, with
great arched doorways over the carriage-ways and footwalks. Balustrades
four feet high ran along the whole length of the bridge, outside of
the footwalks, to protect the pedestrians.
The bridge rested upon the abutments and four piers, all of stone.
The piers were made about one-fourth higher than they had originally
been planned. Those who designed the bridge supposed that the original
piers would be high enough so that no flood would ever reach the top,
but before the framework ever went up the river rose so high as to cover
both the abutments and piers. The piers were immediately raised, and
it is because of this precaution that the bridge was not swept away
in the 1841 freshet which destroyed five bridges over the Delaware above
Trenton. The ends of the piers upstream were semicircular and, after
rising five feet, gradually receded to the top, where they were finished
off in a half-dome. These piers were 62 feet long and 20 feet deep;
in 1876 they and the abutments were lengthened by the addition of 30
feet on the south end. In 1891 they were again lengthened. The present
length is 113 feet. On each pier stood a barrel of water and buckets,
to be used in case of fire.
TOLLS CHARGED
Toll was charged to all vehicles and persons using the bridge. The
charges were: for every pleasure carriage drawn by four horses, 75c,
and if drawn by two horses, 50c; for every stage wagon drawn by four
horses, 62 1/2c, and by two horses, 37 1/2c; every loaded wagon drawn
by four horses, 62 1/2c, and if empty, only 50c. Every wagon drawn by
two horses paid 37 1/2c toll; two-wheel carriages drawn by two horses,
37 1/2c, and if drawn by one horse, 25c. Sleighs and sleds paid 25c;
every single horse and rider, 121/2c; every led horse, the same; every
foot passenger, 3c; every head of mules or horned cattle, 6c, and every
sheep or swine, 1c.
THE FIRST BRIDGE USED FOR INTERSTATE
RAILROAD TRAFFIC
The bridge in South Trenton is the
first bridge in the United States to have been used in interstate railroad
traffic. When trains drawn by locomotives first ran across the bridge,
wagons were prohibited from going across the north wagon road. The rules
of the bridge, until then, had been that all wagons using the bridge
keep to the right. With only one wagon track left, the plan was adopted
of giving the first wagon on the bridge the right of way across. A man
was stationed at each end of the bridge, who would, upon the approach
of any vehicle, ring a bell at the other end by pulling a wire at his
end. This would be a signal to the other attendant not to allow any
vehicle to start across.
The plan proved cumbersome and inconvenient;
on June 29, 1848, the bridge directors decided to build a track expressly
for the crossing of the trains. Thereupon the most southerly arch rib
was moved five feet south of where it had been, on the same piers and
abutments. At the same time, this rib and the one immediately next to
it were strengthened by placing over them a larger and heavier rib.
In constructing the separate track, the southern footway of the bridge
had to be abandoned, but the north wagon road was restored and the difficulty
in handling vehicles eliminated.
For fifteen years the bridge remained
in this condition without change, when a fire occurred in the first
span on the Jersey side which threatened the whole structure. The fire
had been started by a spark from a passing locomotive, and this led
the bridge company to have the shingled roof of the bridge removed.
The sheds and other enclosures on the bridge were removed at the same
time.
As early as 1868 the bridge company
realized that the old bridge would soon have to be abandoned. On March
10 of that year application was made to the Legislature for authority
to extend the piers. Nothing seems to have been done, however, until
1874 when the railroad company decided to build a new iron bridge sufficient
to carry two tracks. The old bridge had been the subject of much complaint,
many people having expressed the fear of a serious accident happening
when a heavy train passed over. It fact, accidents on the driveways
had been frequent, for the bridge had been neglected so long that wagons
often broke through the rotten flooring.
The additions to the piers and abutments, to allow
for an iron bridge bearing two tracks, were completed in July 1874.
Work on the iron frame began in December, and the last span connecting
with the Jersey shore was in place by August 1875. The wagon ways of
the old bridge were closed in December and the slow work in dismantling
the rotten and rusted bridge began. The piers and abutments were then
raised four feet and the iron bridge moved to its permanent site, 18
feet north of where it had been built. This was done early in 1876.
There was a footway at the southern end of the bridge; wagons had to
use the Calhoun Street bridge until an iron span to accommodate them
could be built north of the railroad bridge which had just been put
in place. The wagon bridge, made of iron, was erected in 1876. Joseph
A. Wilson, a noted engineer of that time, designed the bridges and the
Keystone Bridge Company of Pittsburgh built them. The bridge company
granted the use of the railroad tracks upon the southern span to the
Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad for a term ending in 2870, and in
June of the same year this contract was assigned to the Pennsylvania
Railroad Company. 74
74 See
Trenton Sunday Times-Advertiser, February 18, 1917.
NEW STEEL BRIDGE BUILT
In 1892, a new steel bridge was built just south
of the iron railroad span, resting partly on piers and abutments newly,
built and partly on the piers and abutments built back in 1874. The
American Bridge Company constructed the bridge at their local plant.
The bridge accommodated four tracks. In 1898 the railroad span of the
old iron bridge, built in 1875, was taken down and replaced by a steel
bridge, also a four-track affair, built by the American Bridge Company.
In 1908, after the Pennsylvania Railroad Company had opened its new
stone railroad bridge a few hundred yards south of the old bridge, the
two steel bridges (built in 1892 and 1898) were taken down and shipped
south, where they now span the Potomac at Washington. The stone railroad
bridge has eighteen stone arches, four of them at each end for approaches
and ten spanning the channel.
The iron bridge, built in 1876 and
used for foot and carriage traffic, continued to stand. It was a toll
bridge until June 22, 1918, when it was taken over by the joint Commission
for Eliminating Toll Bridges, at a price of $240,000. Its five iron
spans, varying from 166 to 208 feet in length and providing a roadway
20 feet wide, were considered unsafe. Though the flooring had been rebuilt
by the joint commission during the latter part of 1921 and the spring
of 1922, the bridge was still unsuitable for the heavy motor-truck traffic
which passed over it. Accordingly, during 1928 the joint commission
built a new steel bridge on the piers of the railroad bridge which used
to stand immediately south of the toll bridge, after some changes in
the masonry of the piers and abutments had been made. The bridge has
a double roadway with an aggregate width of 42 feet, and a sidewalk
on the north side. The bridge, whose cost is estimated at $650,000,
is called the Lincoln Highway Bridge, after the highway which passes
over it. This highway connects San Francisco and New York. At Trenton
it begins at the bridge, turns into Warren Street and proceeds to the
Battle Monument, where it follows the line of Princeton Avenue. The
old bridge was dismantled in 1929.
The Upper Trenton, or Calhoun Street
Bridge, crossing from Trenton to Morrisville, Pa., was opened for travel
in 1860. It was built by the Trenton City Bridge Company, which was
incorporated by an Act of the Pennsylvania Legislature on February 24,
1840, and by an Act of our Legislature on March 8, 1842. Its original
capital stock was $48,000; the bridge cost $60,000. It was 1274 feet
long and consisted of seven spans of wood construction, resting upon
six stone piers and two stone abutments and covered by a wooden roof.
The bridge accommodated two driveways and two footways. A fire destroyed
it completely on June 25, 1884, but it was not until two years later
that it was rebuilt. The new construction was of iron and consisted
of two main trusses. A double driveway passed over it and there was
a sidewalk outside of the north truss. The bridge still stands, and
over it pass the trolley tracks of the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Traction
Company. The bridge was taken over by the joint commission on November
12, 1928, at a price of $250,000, and opened free to the public.
VI. Canals
IT WAS Governor Mahlon Dickerson who
first gave official expression to the project of a canal across the
State in his message to the two Houses of the New Jersey Legislature,
January 12, 1816. He said:
I must beg leave to call attention to a projected
improvement of great national importance. I mean the construction of
a canal to connect the waters of the Delaware River with those of the
Raritan. We have the most satisfactory evidence that the expense of
constructing such a canal, on the most practicable route, would bear
but a small proportion of the immense advantages to be derived from
it . . . .
The project was favorably reported by the committee
to which it had been referred, January 25, 1816. Subscription books
for the stock of the company were soon opened throughout the State as
well as in New York City and Philadelphia, but the response of the public
was discouraging. Various considerations militated against the success
of the drive for subscriptions, chief among them being the opinion among
investors that the income to be derived from the tolls would provide
a meager return on the large capital which the canal venture would require.
FIRST ATTEMPTS
COME TO NOTHING
Various attempts to revive interest
in the project were made, all of them unsuccessful. In 1823 we find
a committee of the Legislature to whom the subject of the Delaware and
Raritan Canal had been referred, reporting that “we have considered
the subject with all the attention which its great importance demands,
and are of the opinion that such a canal, if it could be effected at
an expense not too great for the resources of the State, and without
imposing a burdensome weight of taxation, ought to be carried into execution
by the State itself.” The committee recommended that the Legislature
appoint commissioners who were to report at the next session on the
practicability of the canal, its probable expense and the revenue to
be derived therefrom, and any agreement that might be made with the
federal government in respect to it. In December of the same year the
Legislature passed an Act appointing Lucius Q. C. Elmer, Peter Kean
and George Holcombe commissioners for the purpose of ascertaining the
practicability and expediency of a canal to unite the Delaware and Raritan
Rivers.
Again nothing was done in the matter,
despite further abortive attempts to bring the canal project to a head.
Finally, an Act incorporating the Delaware and Raritan Canal Company
passed the Council and General Assembly on February 4, 1830, the charter
being vested in a private company and not in the State, as had first
been contemplated.
PROVISIONS OF THE CANAL CHARTER
The capital stock was to be $1,000,000, with the privilege of increasing
the amount by $500,000. The Act of incorporation required the width
of the canal to be not less than 50 feet and the depth 5 feet throughout,
but an Act passed in February 1831 increased the minimum width to 75
feet and the depth to 7 feet. The company was empowered to supply the
canal with water from the Delaware by constructing a feeder in the form
of a navigab1e canal, not less than 30 feet wide and 4 feet deep. Work
on the canal and feeder started within two years and finished within
eight; otherwise the Act was to be null and void. The State reserved
the right of subscribing to one-quarter of the stock of the company
by January 1, 1831, and to buy in the road after fifty years, upon appraisement
made according to law (Act of February 3, 1831). The Act of incorporation
also provided that the canal company was to pay the State eight cents
for each passenger or ton of merchandise transported, except for coal,
lumber, lime, wood and other low-priced articles of commerce, for which
only two cents a ton was to be paid. The State, in turn, agreed not
to allow any corporation or individual to construct a canal or railroad
within five miles of any of the canal.
WORK OF DIGGING COMMENCES
The work of digging the canal and feeder and of building
the dam to supply feed water was begun in 1832. The Delaware River dam
(located at the head of Bull’s Island), the feeder and that section
of the canal lying between Trenton and New Brunswick, were completed
in 1834, but it was not until 1838 that the section between Trenton
and Bordentown, where the canal flows into the river, was opened. Pennsylvania
objected to the presence of the dam across the river on the ground that
she had not authorized its construction and that it took water out of
the river which was not returned into the stream. There were further
reasons that the shad fisheries objected to the dam and that it was
built in direct violation of an agreement between Pennsylvania and New
Jersey entered into April 26, 1783. New Jersey, in her turn, objected
to the wing-wall dam which the Delaware Division Canal had built in
the Delaware at Well’s Falls to supply additional water for navigation
below New Hope. However, the commissioners of the two States came to
an agreement on November 22, 1834, whereby both dams were allowed to
remain. 75
75 B.
F. Fackenthal, “Improving Navigation of the Delaware River,”
Bucks County Historical Society Papers, Vol. VI, p. 91.
INTERESTING FACTS ABOUT THE CANAL
The feeder, besides supplying water to the Delaware and Raritan Canal,
was itself a navigable stream over the 22.6 miles of its course, from
the intake at the head of Bull’s Island to Trenton, where it unites
with the main canal. Navigation on the feeder ceased some years ago,
so that now it is used only to supply the main canal. The drawbridges
over the feeder have, accordingly, been replaced by fixed structures.
From New Brunswick to Trenton a distance, of 27.39 miles the canal
traverses comparatively level country so that only six locks are required.
The section between Trenton and Bordentown is 6.27 miles long and has
seven locks, each with a fall of about eight feet. The opening of the
latter section provided the means for an exchange of traffic with the
Delaware Division Canal, which had an outlet at Bristol, with the Schuylkil1
and Susquehanna Canals, the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal from the south,
as well as with all coastwise vessels, thus making possible the transportation
of coal and other cargo across the State of New Jersey to New York and
other tidewater points. In 1854, an outlet lock from the feeder was
built at Lambertville, thus allowing of an exchange of traffic with
the Delaware Division Canal, which had built a similar outlet lock 1
1/4 miles below the New Hope bridge. This provided a much shorter means
of exchange than the outlet docks further down the river at Bordentown
and Bristol. Boats, whether loaded or empty, were ferried across the
Delaware by means of an overhead cable system similar to the one used
by ferry boats a century before. Thousands of tons of pig iron were
shipped over the canal route from the Durham Iron Works to the New Jersey
Steel and Iron Company and the Trenton Iron Company at Trenton.
In its heyday, the Delaware and Raritan Canal was the great artery
of water traffic in this section. In 1866, traffic amounted to 2,857,232
tons, of which 83 per cent was coal. 76
This coal was brought down the Lehigh Canal from Mauch Chunck on barges,
a large part of it finding its way across the Delaware River at New
Hope, Pa., and being taken into the feeder. The barges were then transported
down the feeder into the Delaware and Raritan Canal, and thence distributed
to various sections of the East. All the prominent factories located
along the canal used to maintain basins and docks for the proper handling
of shipments of coal brought to them over the canal route.
76 Charles
S. Boyer, The Waterways of New Jersey, p. 130.
On February 15, 1831, the canal company
and the Camden and Amboy Railroad and Transportation Company were consolidated.
When the Pennsylvania Railroad Company took over the joint Companies,
as the consolidation was known, late in the century under a 999-year
lease, the canal was neglected. No effort was made to attract traffic
to this watercourse and the canal property was allowed to fall into
a state of partial disrepair.
77 By 1908 traffic on the canal had decreased to 397,258
tons. 78 A few steam-driven pleasure craft occasionally traverse
the canal in these days, and now and again coal barges come over the
route to unload their cargos at plants and coal-yards in Trenton. The
limited facilities of the canal and the high rates charged, added to
the obvious disinterest that its lessees have in maintaining and operating
it as a successful venture, makes it probable that the canal will soon
be abandoned.
77 New
York Herald, July 26, 1909.
78 Boyer,
The Waterways of New Jersey, p. 130.
THE PROPOSED SHIP-CANAL
It is doubtful, however, whether this move will be
authorized before the proposed ship-canal across New Jersey, connecting
Raritan Bay with the Delaware River and one of the links in the great
intra-coastal waterways now being urged by the Atlantic Deeper Waterways
Association, receives the approval and support of the federal government.
The New Jersey Legislature has authorized the project, which will begin
at Morgan, on Raritan Bay, pass to the south of South Amboy, and continue
across the State through Old Bridge, Scotts Corner and Dutch Neck, and
then split into two routes, joining together again at the river just
above Bordentown. The upper route will be the “lock-canal route”
and the lower one - a straight stretch - the “sea-level route.”
The ship-canal was approved several
years ago by the United States Engineer Department, but the coming of
the war in April 1917 deferred the project. The matter is again before
the board of engineers and is certain of being recommended to Congress
which, having authorized the Intra-Coastal Waterway, will ultimately
accept and authorize this last link, the New Jersey ship-canal. When
the project is completed it will link up with the deeper Delaware development
at Duck Island, just below Trenton, thus insuring that city a commercial
prominence in eastern transportation such as it has never enjoyed.
VII. Railroads
THE first railroad charter to be granted
in America was that given by the New Jersey Legislature on February
6, 1815, to the New Jersey Railroad Company for the construction of
a road, of wood or iron, from the Delaware, near Trenton, to the Raritan
River, near New Brunswick. The road was never built. On February 4,
1830, the same day on which the Delaware and Raritan Canal Company was
incorporated, the Camden and Amboy Railroad and Transportation Company
was created by an Act of the Legislature. The provisions of its charter
were quite similar to those set up in the charter of the canal company.
CHARTER PROVISIONS
The capital stock was to be $1,000,000, with the privilege of increasing
the amount by $500,000. The road was to run between Camden and Raritan
Bay and its right of way was to be no more than 11 feet wide. Work on
the line was to be started within two years and finished in nine. The
State reserved the right of subscribing to one-quarter of the stock
before January 1, 1831, but the right was never exercised. The State
also reserved the right to buy in the road after 30 years, upon appraisal
made according to law. The road was to report quarterly on the number
of passengers and tons of freight carried over its line, and the amount
that the company might charge for carriage was not to exceed 10 cents
the mile per passenger or 8 cents the mile for every ton of freight
carried. Out of this the State was to receive a transit duty of 10 cents
for every passenger carried and 15 cents per ton of freight, in lieu
of all taxes. On its part, the State provided that if the Legislature
ever permitted a railroad to pass across the State, beginning or terminating
within three miles of the Camden and Amboy terminals, then all transit
duties were to cease.
RAILROAD AND
CANAL CONSOLIDATED
The Camden and Amboy Railroad and Transportation
Company and the Delaware and Raritan Canal Company were consolidated
by an Act passed February 15, 1831, to the end that the joint Companies
might carry through the construction of the canal and railroad, building
and maintaining both according to the provisions of the respective charters.
This Act was popularly called the “Marriage Act.” The directors
of both companies were to manage the affairs of the joint Companies
in joint meeting. Previous to this consolidation, an Act had been passed
on February 4, authorizing the railroad company to transfer a thousand
shares of its stock to the State. Under the Act of February 15, the
joint Companies guaranteed the State an annual dividend of $30,000,
plus transit duty. This, added to the undoubted influence which the
joint Companies exercised in the legislative halls of this State, led
to New Jersey’s being called the “State of Camden and Amboy.”
The Joint Companies at once set about building a
railroad from Camden to South Amboy. The first section, between White
Hill, just below Bordentown, and South Amboy, a distance of 35 miles,
was begun in 1831 and completed February 1833. The rails were of cast
iron, placed on granite blocks measuring two feet square and one foot
in depth, spaced at intervals of three feet. The line from Bordentown
to Camden was completed soon after, the rails used in this section being
of wood, faced by iron, in view of the fact that the road was to be
used only two or three months during the year. This type of rail was
popularly known as “snake rail.”
From February to September, 1833, carriages
passing on the then completed Bordentown-Amboy stretch were drawn by
horses. Three lines ran daily. The locomotive, “John Bull,”
furnished the traction power after September, and continued in operation
in this vicinity until 1866. The entire road, from Amboy to Camden,
was opened to traffic in January 1834, but a train had been run over
the length of the road almost a month earlier, December 17, 1833. The
line passed by Trenton about six miles to the east of the town. A monument
marks the spot where the first piece of track was laid by the Camden
and Amboy Railroad Company in 1831r . It was erected by the Pennsylvania
Railroad Company on November 12, 1891, and is located on the east side
of the road leading from Trenton to Bordentown, just a bit this side
of the latter place. A bronze tablet bears this inscription:
First movement by steam on a railroad in the State
of New Jersey, November 12, 1831, by the original locomotive, “John
Bull,” now deposited in the United States National Museum in Washington.
The first piece of railroad track in New Jersey was laid by the Camden
and Amboy Railroad Company between this point and the stone, thirty-five
hundred feet eastward, in 1831.
The base of the monument is made of granite blocks
originally used as supports for the rails in place of the now familiar
wooden ties.
THE RAPID EXTENSION OF THE JOINT COMPANIES'
OPERATIONS
The State of Pennsylvania chartered the Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad
Company, February 23, 1832, with authority to construct a railroad from
Kensington to the Trenton Bridge at Morrisville. The road from the bridge
as far as Bristol was completed in 1833, while the stretch from Bristol
to Kensington was finished by November 1834. A large company of prominent
Trentonians accepted the invitation of the company to make an excursion
to Philadelphia in the new cars going out of Morrisville, November 1,
1834. The 28 miles to Philadelphia were covered in an hour and a half.
Two trains ran on this route daily on and after November 3, 1834, one
train leaving each terminal in the morning. Coaches conveyed passengers
between Trenton and the trains in Morrisville without charge. Later,
when the Delaware and Raritan Canal was opened, passengers were conveyed
gratis from the trains to the canal, there to take boats for Princeton,
Bound Brook and New Brunswick.
By an Act passed in 1834, the Legislature authorized the Philadelphia
and Trenton Railroad Company to construct a bridge across the Delaware
at Trenton for the accommodation of its trains. This work was never
undertaken because of the great outcry against authorizing another bridge
near the one already up, when the owners of the latter were not even
receiving legal interest on the money they had sunk into the project.
At the next session of the Legislature, however, the company was authorized
to purchase and hold the stock of any turnpike, railroad, steam or other
corporation, or any bridge company, so that it might be able to complete
a line of communication between New York and Philadelphia, by way of
New Brunswick and Trenton.
In 1834 the Trenton and New Brunswick Turnpike Company sought authorization
to lay tracks on their turnpike and to extend them down to the river.
Captain Robert F. Stockton and others interested in the joint Companies,
viewing the activity of their competitors in trying to set up a rival
line between New York and Philadelphia, quietly obtained the controlling
interest in three companies: the Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad,
the Trenton Bridge, and the Trenton and Brunswick Turnpike. In this
way, the joint Companies not only put themselves in a position where
they could stifle any competition attempted by these lines, but also
obtained corporate mediums through which they could obtain whatever
end they desired.
The Trenton citizenry, upon learning of the contemplated move of the
joint Companies to build a railroad through Trenton, protested against
this unheard-of innovation. One of the editors of that day wrote: “As
to the contemplated railroad to be run through Trenton, we trust that
the citizens of the place almost to a man will oppose it. It would be
exceedingly injurious to all business in whatever street the fiery cars
should suffer to pass. The town would derive no advantage by such an
improvement, but suffer much injury.”
The hand of the joint Companies may be seen behind every move from
this time on. As early as September 1, 1836, the Philadelphia and Trenton
Railroad Company and the New Jersey Railroad and Transportation Company
(which had been chartered March 7, 1832, and authorized to build a railroad
from Jersey City to New Brunswick, which was completed in 1836) had
entered into an agreement whereby the former company should, within
12 months from the date of the agreement, extend its railroad from Trenton
bridge so as to intersect, at some suitable point to be selected at
or near Trenton, the contemplated railroad of the joint Companies. The
Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad Company then laid its rails across
the Trenton bridge with the permission of the bridge company, and continued
them on the bridge company’s property between the bridge and Bloomsbury
(today Warren) Street. In laying down this line, Bridge Street, as far
as Warren, was opened up. The railroad company then proceeded to continue
its track eastward to the canal. The Legislature at once appointed a
committee to investigate this action and the committee reported back
that the State could not recognize the right of the Philadelphia and
Trenton Railroad Company, or any other foreign corporation, even though
it had the consent of the bridge company and operated on its own property,
to lay a railroad within the limits of New Jersey without the authority
of the Legislature.
It must not be forgotten that the joint Companies held the controlling
interest in the Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad at the time this line,
running across the bridge and over to the canal, was constructed. In
1837 the Legislature gave the joint Companies the authority to construct
a road from New Brunswick to Trenton and thence to Bordentown, with
a branch to the Delaware bridge. This authority, of course, fitted exactly
the plans which the Camden and Amboy group had been formulating for
several years, even to the permission given for laying its tracks upon
the Trenton and New Brunswick Turnpike, controlled by the joint Companies.
The branch railroad connecting Trenton bridge with the Camden and Amboy
main line ran from the bridge to Bloomsbury Street and then eastward
to the canal bank. There it ran north along the west bank of the canal
until it came to Merchant Street, through which it proceeded as far
as Stockton, and thence up Stockton Street to Hanover and in Hanover
to the southeast corner of Greene (Broad) and Hanover Streets, where
the office of the railroad company was located. The tracks of the railroad
company were the first railroad or street car tracks to be laid in Trenton.
By May 1837 the Philadelphia trains ran once a day to and from the Hanover
Street station. Despite the appellation of “trains,” it
must be noted that the cars were drawn by horses from the Hanover Street
station to Morrisville. Until January 1, 1839, when the first continuous
route between Philadelphia and New York was opened, persons desiring
to continue on their journey north or south, left the cars at State
Street and walked across the bridge to take the trains at the depot
of the Camden and Amboy Line which stood on the southwest corner of
East Canal and State Streets.
That part of the new Camden and Amboy line extending from Trenton to
Bordentown was started in September 1837. Passengers were carried over
it in 1838. This road branched off from the old Camden and Amboy line
at Prince Street, Bordentown. A depot was built for this line on the
east side of the canal, on East State Street. It was a large, rough
wooden building, where tickets for Philadelphia, via Camden, were on
sale at $1.35 each way. The running time, including the ferry ride from
Camden to Philadelphia, was three hours.
In June 1838 work began on the Camden and Amboy line between Trenton
and New Brunswick, the construction being completed in six months. The
route followed the tow-path on the east side of the canal for 13 miles
to a point near Kingston, where it branched off and proceeded to New
Brunswick. This line permitted a continuous passage from New York to
Philadelphia by rail for the first time, and laid the foundation for
one of the most valuable railroad properties in the whole world. The
line was put into operation on January 1, 1839. The horse cars between
this city and Morrisville were discontinued, and locomotives first ran
across the Trenton Bridge on that date, drawing the first train of cars
ever to negotiate the New York to Philadelphia distance in one, continuous
run.
THE BELVIDERE DELAWARE RAILROAD
In 1836 the Belvidere Delaware Railroad was projected from Trenton
to Belvidere. It was not until February 6, 1851, that the Trenton -Lambertville
line was opened. 79
On February 3, 1854, the line through to Phillipsburg was opened to
traflic. 80
In 1863 the road was extended to Manunka Chunk. The Belvidere Delaware
Railroad fell into the hands of the Camden and Amboy group soon after.
79 Anderson,
Navigation on the Upper Delaware, p. 13.
80 ibid.,
p. 32.
By an Act passed February 27, 1867, the Legislature confirmed an agreement
consolidating the joint Companies and the New Jersey Railroad and Transportation
Company. The new company was known as the United New Jersey Railroad
and Canal Company, commonly called the “United Companies.”
The railroads, canals, and other property owned by this large company
and the Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad Company, in which the United
Companies held a controlling interest, were leased to the Pennsylvania
Railroad Company for a period of 999 years, on June 30, 1871. This agreement
was approved by an Act of the Legislature passed March 27, 1873. Since
1871 the Pennsylvania Railroad has built its property up into a system
which has few rivals in the world.
THE DELAWARE AND BOUND BROOK RAILROAD
The Delaware and Bound Brook Railroad was incorporated under the General
Railroad Law of New Jersey, May 12, 1874. Contracts for the construction
of the road were awarded in October of the same year, and the road was
opened to traffic May 1, 1876. The Trenton branch of this railroad extends
from Trenton to Trenton junction, a distance Of 3.7 miles, and serves
as a feeder to the main line, into which it runs at Trenton Junction.
The distance from Trenton Junction to Bound Brook is 27 miles; at the
latter place the line connects with the road of the Central Railroad
of New Jersey, 32.4 miles from New York. The railroad property and plant
of the Delaware and Bound Brook Railroad Company was leased to the Philadelphia
and Reading Railroad Company for 990 years, on May 14, 1879.
THE EAST TRENTON RAILROAD
The East Trenton Railroad was incorporated April 17, 1884, to provide
the many industrial plants in East Trenton with railroad facilities.
It runs from a point in the Trenton Branch of the Bound Brook Division
of the Reading road, where it crosses Christopher Street, Trenton, to
New York Avenue in East Trenton. The railroad was made part of the Reading
system soon after it was opened.
PRESENT FACILITIES
The Millham Branch of the Pennsylvania Railroad also serves the East
Trenton manufacturers. It is a continuation of the Pennsylvania main
line coming up along the east bank of the canal from Bordent0wn. The
branch runs up along the canal until it reaches Mulberry Street. There
it curves to the right and joins the main line to New York, a bit east
of Whitehead Road.
The Pennsylvania Railroad Company’s line now runs from Philadelphia
over the 18-arch stone bridge in South Trenton, and thence through Trenton,
crossing under the canal and continuing on to New York. The railroad
station is located on South Clinton Avenue and consists of a ticket
office, a large waiting room, and two island platforms several hundred
feet in length. The local station of the Reading system is situated
on North Warren Street near Tucker.
VIII. Street Railways
THE carriage and the omnibus were the local means
of conveyance before the coming of the horse car. Omnibuses early carried
passengers from the State Street railroad station to the Warren Street
hotels. In the ‘6o’s, the omnibuses met the trains at the
newly-built Clinton Street station. Legislators, travelling from their
homes throughout the State to the sessions of the Legislature, were
undoubtedly struck by the inadequacy of local transportation facilities.
This, and the steady growth of Trenton away from the center of town,
made a street railway system a necessity.
The Legislature accordingly granted
a charter to the Trenton Horse Railroad Company on March 9, 1859. The
capital stock was set at $30,000 and the corporation was prohibited
from using steam upon its tracks. The route of the railway was to be
through Clinton and State Streets, from the northeastern to the western
limits of the town. The incorporators were: Timothy Field, Robert Aitken,
William M. Force, Lewis Perrine, Thomas P. Johnston, Jonathan S. Fish,
Charles Moore, Joseph Whittaker and James T. Sherman.
An ordinance passed by Common Council, July 28, 1863,
gave the road authority to lay a track from the northeasterly to the
westerly limits of the city, through Clinton and State Streets, and
from the feeder bridge on North Warren Street south as far as Ferry
Street. The track was to be of 5.2 gauge, “paved with good boulders,”
and the motive power was to be nothing else than horse or mule. Cars
were not to run on Sunday and “bells of proper size and tone to
notify passengers . . . of the approach of the cars” were to be
attached to the horses. The speed of the cars was not to exceed six
miles an hour and the fare was to be five cents. In 1883 the company
was authorized to construct a double track from the Clinton Street station
to the western terminus.
CONSTRUCTION BEGUN IN 1863
The construction of the road began
in 1863. The line began at the Clinton Street station and ran up Clinton
into State, along which street it continued until it reached Calhoun.
There was a shed for the horses and a waiting room on the north side
of State Street, just beyond Calhoun. The waiting room was destroyed
by fire soon after and was replaced by an old horse car from which the
trucks had been removed. A few years later the State Street line was
extended as far as Prospect Street and the horse-car waiting room was
moved to the new terminus. A spur, extending from State Street to Hanover,
was built in North Warren Street at the time that the first State Street
line was constructed. This line was later abandoned.
In 1883, six cars were in constant
operation on this line, running at intervals of eight minutes. At that
time the Trenton Horse Railroad Company also ran a baggage express service
in this city. The Common Council of Chambersburg authorized the company
to extend its tracks from Clinton Street station to the southerly limits
of Chambersburg, in February 1886. The line was to run south on Clinton
Street. Twelve months later the company received authority to construct
a horse railroad along Prospect Street, beginning at State, and on Hamilton
Avenue. In December of the same year permission was given for building
the Hamilton Avenue, Monmouth and East State Street branch. A spur was
also built along Whittaker Avenue, extending from Hamilton Avenue to
Clinton. Soon after, the line running from Broad and Perry Streets over
to Warren Street and thence along Bank, Willow and Spring Streets to
Prospect, was constructed.
LATER DEVELOPMENTS
The City Railway Company was incorporated under the general law in
1875, with an authorized capital of $50,000. In February 1876, Common
Council authorized the construction of a horse-car line through Clinton
Street, from the city limits to Perry Street, and thence to Broad, terminating
at the Chambersburg borough line. The track was to be a double one.
Work on the road began early in 1876 and was open to traffic in August
of the same year. At this time the borough of Chambersburg authorized
the company to extend its tracks from the canal to the southeasterly
borough limits, along South Broad Street.
The City Railway Company was in October 1876 empowered to extend its
line from Perry Street to Warren and thence to Ferry Street, up Bridge
and into Centre Street down as far as Riverview Cemetery. In October
1885, an ordinance permitted the company to extend its tracks from South
Broad Street along Bridge Street, thence into Centre as far south as
Lalor Street, and along Lalor to the canal. The next year, authority
was given by the city to build a line along Hamilton Avenue. In this
year the borough of Chambersburg extended the City Railway Company’s
franchise to Jennie Street, Hudson Street, Elmer Street, Chestnut Avenue,
Cummings Avenue and Coleman Street, with a spur through Cummings Avenue
to Division Street, to the car sheds and stables.
The Trenton Horse Railroad Company passed into the hands of Colonel
Lewis Perrine at about this time. In 1891 he acquired control of the
City Railway Company and consolidated the two roads on September 30,
1891, under the name of the Trenton Passenger Railway Company (Consolidated).
In 1892 Colonel Perrine had the roads electrified and on May 22 of that
year the first experimental trip by electricity was made.
NOTE
The author gratefully acknowledges
the collaboration of Mr. Sidney Goldmann in the preparation of this
chapter.
©
1929, TRENTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY |