CHAPTER IV
Some Notable
Events of Post-Revolutionary Times
BY MARY J. MESSLER
I. Proposal to Make Trenton the Federal
Capital
AFTER a few years of comparative quiet,
following the the Battles of Trenton in 1776 and 1777, Trenton again
came into prominence in 1783, due to the controversy over the location
of the federal capital. The part that Trenton played in that controversy
has been carefully studied and presented by Dr. Hall in his History
of the Presbyterian Church in Trenton and by Dr. Godfrey in his
history of the Mechanics Bank, and forms a most interesting episode
in the history of the city.
1
1 The
writer is indebted to Dr. Godfrey's account for several citations from
the Papers of the Continental Congress. The other quotations
used throughout the chapter have been made directly from the sources
quoted.
THE PERIPATETIC CONTINENTAL CONGRESS
During the Revolution, the Continental
Congress had met in various places, depending upon the fortunes of the
war and the wishes of its members. In June 1783, when the Congress was
sitting at Philadelphia, a number of the non-commissioned officers and
soldiers of the Pennsylvania Line, exasperated by the delays in settling
their claims, set out for Philadelphia to lay the matter before the
authorities and demand a redress of their grievances and a settlement
of their accounts. The State of Pennsylvania took no action in calling
out the militia, and on the twenty-first of June a party of about thirty
armed men marched to the State House where the Executive Council was
in session. A message was sent in to that body that if the demands of
the mutineers were denied, they would let the soldiers in upon the Council.
The members of the Council rejected the terms proposed, but a special
meeting of Congress was immediately called to determine upon a course
of action. It was late in the day before a quorum could be obtained,
and by that time the mutineers numbered some three hundred men. The
members of Congress were panic-stricken, and immediately adopted a resolution
declaring that they had been grossly insulted and authorizing President
Elias Boudinot “to summon the members of Congress to meet on Thursday
next at Trenton or Princeton in New Jersey in order that further and
more effectual measures may be taken for suppressing the present revolt
and maintaining the dignity and authority of the United States.”2
2 New
Jersey Gazette, July 9, 1783.
No sooner had Vice-President John Cox
3 of the New Jersey State Council received President
Boudinot’s letter of the twenty-third, informing him of this decision
of Congress, than he “summoned a meeting of the inhabitants of
Trenton and the vicinity; who being justly alarmed at the daring insult
offered to the Supreme Government of the American Union, and being desirous
of testifying their zeal in support of the dignity and privileges of
Congress,” immediately passed the following resolutions:
4
At a meeting of the inhabitants of Trenton, and vicinity, at the
French Arms 5
on Tuesday the 24th June, 1783.
Having been informed, from undoubted authority, that a most gross and
daring insult has been offered to Congress, the Supreme Government of
the American Union, by a number of lawless people in arms, assembled
at the State-House in Philadelphia on Saturday last:
Resolved unanimously, That we think it our immediate duty to express
our resentment and indignation at so flagitous a proceeding.
Resolved unanimously, That we look upon tyranny and anarchy with equal
abhorrence; and as we have, at the risque of everything, opposed the
former, we are determined, at the same risque, not to be wanting in
our efforts to suppress the latter, on whatever occasion or under whatever
form it may present itself.
Resolved unanimously, That we consider the support
of civil government and the majesty of the laws as one of the first
of social duties, and riotous citizens who disturb the publick order
and violate the dignity of the Union as the worst of enemies.
Resolved unanimously, That we feel the utmost cheerfulness in pledging
our lives and fortunes to the government under which we live, in whatever
way our services may be required, whether in resisting foreign invasion
or quelling intestine tumults.
Resolved unanimously, That we would deem ourselves highly honored by
the presence of Congress, and by an opportunity of testifying our zeal
in support of their dignity and privileges, should they in their wisdom,
think proper to adjourn to, or fix their residence in this State.
Signed by order and in behalf of the inhabitants,
JOHN COX
DAVID BREARLEY
PHILEMON DICKINSON
SAML TUCKER
WM. C. HOUSTON
SAM. W. STOCKTON
Committee.
3 John
Cox was Lieutenant Colonel, Philadelphia Associators, and took part
in the expedition which resulted in the Battle of Trenton. General Stryker,
in his account of Washington’s reception in 1789, thus describes
the event: “Colonel Cadwalader immediately sent out scouts and
adopted such a course as the information gained might warrant. Adjutant
General Joseph Reed with Lieutenant Colonel John Cox and Major Joseph
Cowperthwaite went towards Bordentown in search of the Hessian pickets,
but of course found their post deserted.”
In 1781-82 Cox was a member of the Legislative Council.
He was also a prominent churchman and a member of the vestry of St.
Michael’s Church 1785-90. Before the Revolution, John Cox was
a merchant in Philadelphia, but he removed to Trenton to improve the
condition of his health. In 1790 he returned to Philadelphia and died
there April 28, 1793. He was a man of highest character and abilities
and his home at “Bloomsbury” was the scene of numerous social
functions. His wife and two of his daughters participated in the reception
to Washington in 1789. See Schuyler, History of St. Michael’s
Church, p. 91.
4 New
Jersey Gazette, July 16, 1783.
5 This
famous tavern stood on the southwest corner of King (now Warren) and
Second (now State) Streets. From April 1, 1780, to February, 1781, it
was called the Thirteen Stars, but when John Cape became proprietor
in 1781 he changed the name to the French Arms, which name was retained
until January 4, 1785, when the tavern was leased to Francis Witt. He
had been the proprietor of a tavern on North King Street, called the
Blazing .Star, and merely transferred the sign to his new establishment.
The name was again changed, this time to the City Tavern, in April 1789,
when Henry Drake became its proprietor.
These resolutions, together with the report of a
subcommittee, composed of Moore Furman, Stacy Potts, and Benjamin Smith,
which stated that “sixty Persons, or upwards can be accommodated
here,” 6 were forwarded
to President Boudinot the following day by the chairman of the meeting.
As they did not reach him until after his decision had been made to
withdraw Congress secretly from Philadelphia to Princeton late on the
twenty-fourth of June, 1783, nothing further was done in regard to them
until Congress reconvened in Princeton on the first of July. The following
day, when the resolutions were laid before Congress, it was unanimously:
7
Resolved, That the President inform Mr. Cox, that Congress entertain
just sentiments of the respectful manner in which the inhabitants of
Trenton and its vicinity express themselves in their resolve of the
24th of June last, with regard to Congress.
That Congress highly applaud the proper resentment the citizens of
Trenton and its vicinity have discovered against disturbers of the public
peace and violators of the dignity of the Union.
6 Papers,
Continental Congress, Vol. XLVI, .p. 87.
7 Journals
of Congress, July 2, 1783.
The above resolutions, together with
a personal letter from President Boudinot, were forwarded to John Cox,
July 3, 1783. Congress also sent a resolution to His Excellency William
Livingston, governor of New Jersey, expressing its “high sense
of the spirit and attachment of the citizens of New Jersey to the federal
union,” but informing his excellency “that events have rendered
the call of the citizens into service unnecessary.”8
8 New
Jersey Gazette, July 16, 1783.
In the meantime, in view of the resolutions
of Congress passed June 4, 1783, officially informing the executives
of the several States of its intention to consider propositions for
selecting a “permanent residence” for Congress on the first
Monday of the following October, the Legislature of New Jersey, on June
19, 1783, agreed to offer to the United States jurisdiction over any
district within the State to the extent of twenty miles square, and
to grant £30,000 in specie for the purchase of lands and the erection
of buildings. The resolutions also invited the inhabitants of New Jersey
desiring the national capital in their particular locality to transmit
their proposals to their representatives in Congress before the time
limited for consideration. The inhabitants of Lamberton 9 in Nottingham township, south of the Assunpink Creek, were among those
who presented to Congress the advantages of their specific locality.
10
9 During
the period of which we are writing, the district which we now call Trenton
consisted of the city of Trenton north of the Assunpink Creek and the
districts known as Lamberton, Mill Hill and Bloomsbury, south of the
creek. Lamberton was named for Thomas Lambert who settled there about
1679. It was annexed to Trenton in 1856. The locality immediately adjoining
the Assunpink on the south was in early times called Kingsbury, and
afterwards Kensington Hill, but when it came to be a considerable manufacturing
place the name was changed to Mill Hill. In 1840, Mill Hill was incorporated
with Bloomsbury, which had been established by Alexander Chambers as
a port for ships, to form the Borough of South Trenton. This borough
was annexed to Trenton in 1851.
10 Papers,
Continental Congress, Vol. XLVI, pp. 35, 39,
43, 49.
On October 6, 1783, when Congress took
up the question “in which State buildings shall be provided and
erected for the residence of Congress; beginning with New Hampshire
and proceeding in the order in which they stand,” each State was
successively negatived. On the following morning, a motion was made
by Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, “that buildings for the use
of Congress be erected on the banks of the Delaware near Trenton, or
of the Patowmack, near Georgetown, provided a suitable district can
be procured on one of the rivers as aforesaid, for a federal town.”
Amendments left only the names of the rivers and it was finally resolved
that the site should be “near the falls,” that is, near
Trenton on the Jersey side, or in Pennsylvania on the opposite side.
Congress further resolved “that a committee of five be appointed
to repair to the falls of the Delaware, to view the situation of the
country in its neighborhood and report a proper district for carrying
into effect the preceding resolution.”
A QUARREL BETWEEN THE NORTH AND THE
SOUTH
The question now resolved itself into
a quarrel between the North and the South. New England favored Trenton,
whereas the Southern States felt that in the selection of any site north
of Mason and Dixon’s line their claims for recognition were being
slighted, and their interests sacrificed to New England’s commercialism.
Accordingly, on October 8, 1783, the Southern members supported a motion
to reconsider the proceedings of the previous day “in order to
fix on some other place that shall be more central, more favourable
to the union, and shall approach nearer to that justice which is due
the Southern States.”
11
11 Journals
of Congress, October 6, 7, 8, 1783.
This motion failed, as did other amendments, and
the selection of Trenton or its immediate vicinity appeared to be an
accomplished fact. On the thirteenth of October, 1783, Madison wrote
to Randolph: “Trenton was next proposed, on which question the
votes were divided by the river Delaware . . . . The vicinity of the
falls is to become the future seat of the Federal Government, unless
a conversion of some of the Eastern States can be effected.”
12
12 Madison
Papers, Vol. 1, p. 576.
The continued opposition of an influential
minority led, however, to a compromise, proposed by Elbridge Gerry,
and adopted by Congress October 21, 1783, that Congress should have
two residences to be occupied alternately, the one to be on the Delaware,
as already determined, and the other on the Potomac, at or near Georgetown.
A further resolution, which was also adopted, provided “that until
the buildings to be erected on the banks of the Delaware and Patowmack
shall be prepared for the reception of Congress, their residence shall
be alternately at equal periods of not more than one year, and not less
than six months in Trenton and Annapolis.”
13 This Act was the occasion of a humorous publication
by Francis Hopkinson, of Bordentown, entitled “Intelligence Extraordinary,”
in which he described the new mechanism of government as a “miraculous
pendulum” vibrating “between Annapolis on the Chesapeak
and Trenton on the Delaware, a range of about 180 miles.” 14
13 Journals
of Congress, October 21, 1783.
14 Hopkinson’s
Works, Vol. I, p. 178.
During the course of these discussions
the citizens of Trenton were active in their support of Trenton as the
site of the federal city. Upon learning that the members of the Continental
Congress were considering leaving Princeton because of the poor accommodations
afforded, a town meeting was held at the French Arms to “formulate
attractive conveniences” to induce the members of Congress to
adjourn to Trenton. Rooms and board were offered to the members of Congress
by many of Trenton’s most influential citizens, and “Good
Hay in any quantity” was promised.
15 In spite of these inducements, Congress adjourned from Princeton, November
4, 1783, to meet at Annapolis on the twenty-sixth of the same month.
At Annapolis the question of the federal capital was again reopened,
but no definite action was taken.
15 Papers,
Continental Congress, No. 78, Vol. XXII, pp.
283-6.
Further evidence of Trenton’s
interest in the location of the capital was shown by the will of Dr.
David Cowell, “a physician of respect, and extensive practice,”
who died December 18, 1783. He bequeathed “one hundred pounds
to the United States of America, to be thrown into the fund for erecting
public buildings at Lamberton,” which the New Jersey Gazette
of December 23, 1783, states “is the first legacy we recollect
to have been given to the United States and is respectable for a person
of middle fortune.”
On the third of June, 1784, Congress
adjourned from Annapolis to meet at Trenton on the thirtieth of October
following. One can imagine the joy with which the citizens of Trenton
greeted the news of this honor which they had twice sought without success
the preceding year.
The New Jersey Legislature, then meeting
at New Brunswick, on August 25, 1784, passed a resolution empowering
James Ewing, Moore Furman and Conrad Kotts, as commissioners, to procure
a “Dwelling House” for the President, “and also a
House for Congress to sit in for the dispatch of public Business.” 16
16 Votes
of General Assembly of New Jersey, 1781-84.
Accordingly, on the twenty-second of
September, 1784, the commissioners leased the frame homestead of Stacy
Potts on King Street, later known as the City Hotel, and now the site
of the Rectory of Saint Mary’s Cathedral, for the official residence
of the president of Congress. The house was occupied by Colonel Richard
Henry Lee from November 30, 1784, until his departure for New York on
January 5, 1785. Before his election as president, Colonel Lee occupied
a room in the house of Micajah How on the east side of King Street below
St. Michael’s Church. 17
17 Ballagh,
Letters of Richard Henry Lee, Vol. II, pp. 296, 321.
The French Arms tavern, on the southwest
corner of King and Second Streets, then kept by Jacob G. Bergen, and
the largest building in the city at that time, had already been leased
by the commissioners for the use of Congress while in Trenton, and in
October 1784 extensive preparations were begun to furnish the Long Room
of the tavern suitably for the use of its members. The walls were repapered,
the floors recarpeted and a platform erected in the center of the south
side of the room between the two fireplaces. Thirteen new tables covered
with green cloth and forty-eight new windsor chairs were also provided. 18
18 Godfrey,
The Mechanics Bank, pp. 25-6.
The Continental Congress assembled
in Trenton on Monday, November 1, 1784, with but seven members present.
In the absence of a quorum, it was unable to proceed with business until
the thirtieth of the month, when “a quorum of the States being
represented, they proceeded to the choice of a President, when the Hon.
Richard Henry Lee, Esquire of Virginia, was elected. This is the gentleman
who is said to have originally made the motion in Congress for declaring
the States of America independent, in the year 1776.” On December
3, the Hon. Peter Van Berckel, Minister Plenipotentiary from the Netherlands,
arrived in Trenton to confer with the officials of the Continental Congress.
He probably returned to his legation in Philadelphia the following day. 19
19 New
Jersey Gazette, December 6, 1784.
TRENTON FAVORED
The question of the location of the
federal capital was among the first business taken up by the Congress.
On December 10 South Carolina moved for adjournment, and every effort
was made to have the alternate sessions at Trenton and Annapolis repealed.
Due to the opposition of the Northern members, these measures failed
and on the twentieth of December it was resolved to take measures for
procuring “suitable buildings” for national purposes, and
a sum, not exceeding $100,000, was appropriated for that object. On
the twenty-third of December, an ordinance was introduced providing
for the appointment of three commissioners, “with full powers
to lay out a district of not less than two nor exceeding three miles
square on the banks of either side of the Delaware, not lower than Lamberton
nor more than six miles above it, for a Federal town.” Unsuccessful
efforts were made to substitute Georgetown for Lamberton, but in spite
of the continued opposition of the South the ordinance was finally adopted
that the commissioners should “without delay” have the federal
city laid out in some district “not more than eight miles above
or below the lower falls of the Delaware,” and “enter into
contracts for erecting and completing in an elegant manner, a federal
house for the accommodation of Congress,” and houses for the President
of Congress and principal officers of the government, with a “due
regard” to the “accommodation of the states with lots for
houses for the use of their Delegates respectively; that on the 24th
of December instant Congress stand adjourned to meet at the city of
New York on the 11th day of January following,” and to continue
to meet there until the buildings were ready for their reception. The
immediate expenditures of the commissioners were not to exceed $ 100,000.
Congress adjourned on the day following
this decision, after acknowledging the attentions of the Legislature
of New Jersey “in providing accommodations for their reception,”
and “the exertions of the inhabitants in accomplishing the intentions
of their Legislature.”
20
20 Journals
of Congress, December 23, 24, 1784.
The next step toward making Trenton
the federal capital was taken on February 8, 1785, with the election
of the three commissioners provided for in the ordinance of December
23, 1784. The commissioners chosen by Congress were Philip Schuyler
of New York, Philemon Dickinson, of the “Hermitage,” Trenton,
and Robert Morris, the “patriot financier” of the Revolution.
When General Schuyler declined to serve, John Brown of Providence, R.I.,
was elected in his place. On May 19 he too declined the office.
The landholders of Trenton were fully
aware of the material advantages which would accrue from the location
of the federal capital near their city and the New Jersey Gazettes
of the period contain a number of advertisements offering valuable land
situated near Trenton or Lamberton “where it is expected the Federal
town will be built.” The following passage from a letter written
by Moore Furman, a prominent citizen of Trenton, and the first mayor
of the city in 1792, also expresses the general sentiment of the times: 21
I have lately bartered some land in the country
for a piece here; the spot the Federal Town is to stand on, and if you
have an inclination to make sure of some near me believe me it may now
be had reasonable . . . . Should it ever happen that Congress fix here
it will be very valuable indeed.
21 Letters
of Moore Furman, p. 77.
Soon after the appointment of the commissioners the
personal influence of General Washington was brought to bear on the
members of Congress to crush the Trenton capital plan. On February 8,
1785, he wrote from Mount Vernon to Richard Henry Lee, president of
Congress: 22
By the time your Federal buildings on the banks
of the Delaware, along the point of a triangle, are fit for the reception
of Congress, it will be found that they are very improperly placed for
the seat of the empire, and will have to undergo a second erection in
a more convenient one.
22 Sparks,
Writings of Washington, Vol. IX, pp. 95-6.
On the fifth of April, 1785, the first
appropriation to the commissioners was called for by the Committee of
Supplies – “Federal buildings, $30,000.” William Grayson,
of Virginia, moved its refusal, but he was overruled. On motion of Charles
Pinckney, of South Carolina, that vote was reconsidered and the report
recommitted. Nothing further was done until the twenty-second of September,
when the appropriation of $30,000 coming before the House, Elbridge
Gerry, of Massachusetts, moved to make it the whole sum of $100,000.
As none of the States except Massachusetts and New Jersey voted for
it, the item, upon motion of Samuel Hardy of Virginia, was entirely
stricken out of the bill. 23
This was a virtual repeal of the ordinance and the death blow to Trenton’s
hopes of becoming the capital of the United States.
23 Journals
of Congress, September 22, 1785.
The project was not yet abandoned,
however, for in 1787 the convention of New Jersey which met to ratify
the Constitution of the United States passed a resolution suggesting
to the New Jersey Legislature that in view of the provision in the new
Constitution implying that the seat of government should be placed in
a district not exceeding ten miles square, they “should offer
a Cession to Congress of a district, not exceeding ten Miles Square,
for the Seat of the Government of the United States, over which they
may exercise exclusive Legislation.” 24
This the Legislature did by a bill passed September 9, 1788, offering
the requisite territory.
24 Minutes
of the Convention of State of New Jersey,
December 20, 1787.
A further attempt to make Trenton the
federal capital was made by Mr. Boudinot in the House of Representatives,
September 7, 1789, when he proposed “the banks of either side
of the river Delaware, not more than eight miles above or below the
lower falls.” His motion failed by a vote of four to forty-six.25
25 Annals
of Congress, September 7, 1789.
QUESTION FINALLY SETTLED BY COMPROMISE
The question of the location of the
capital was finally settled by a compromise between the North and the
South. As the northern States were anxious for the assumption of State
debts by the general government, and the southern States were opposed
to the measure, an agreement was reached whereby the South agreed to
vote for the assumption of the debts provided the North voted for the
location of the capital on the Potomac. This scheme is said to have
originated with Robert Morris and Alexander Hamilton and to have been
consummated at the dinner-table of Thomas Jefferson, then Secretary
of State. Thanks to this scheme, in July 1790 it was determined to have
the seat of government on the Potomac, and in 1791 Washington selected
the spot which now bears his name. According to the terms of this Act,
Congress remained in Philadelphia until December 1800.
The final attempt to have Trenton made
the seat of the national government was undertaken December 2, 1801,
when the Legislature of New Jersey unanimously resolved
That the members representing the State, in the Congress of the United
States, be and they are hereby requested, if Congress should resolve
to move, for the purpose of better accommodation from the city of Washington,
to use their best efforts to procure their removal to the city of Trenton,
and they are hereby authorized to proffer, in the name of this State,
the State House and other public buildings belonging to the State for
the use of Congress and their officers, for any length of time that
the Congress shall wish to occupy them and that his excellency the governor,
be requested to transmit a copy of this resolution to the members of
Congress from this State, to be used by them as occasion may offer.
26
26
Journal of Proceedings of Legislative Council of New Jersey,
December 2, 1801.
II. Ratification of the Constitution
by the State o f New Jersey
IN SEPTEMBER 1787, the constitutional
convention completed its work on the Constitution of the United States
and the document was submitted to the several States for ratification.
On the first of November, the Legislature of New Jersey authorized a
convention of the people of New Jersey to accept the new organic law
of the nation. In pursuance of this resolution, on the eleventh day
of December, 1787, thirty-nine delegates, three chosen from each County
in the State, assembled at the Blazing Star, formerly the French Arms,
tavern in Trenton, for the purpose of ratifying the Constitution. The
sessions of the convention were public and each was opened with prayer
by the Rev. James Armstrong, pastor of the Presbyterian Church.
Meeting at ten o’clock and again
at three, the delegates discussed the Constitution, section by section,
for six days. After a fourth reading of the famous document, the work
was considered complete and on Tuesday, December 19, 1787, the convention
“unanimously for and on behalf of the people of the said State
of New Jersey” agreed “to ratify, and confirm the same,
and every Part thereof.” The following day, duplicate parchment
copies of the Constitution, together with the Form of the Ratification,
“one for the Congress of the United States and the other to be
deposited among the Archives of the State,” were signed by the
delegates. After the signature of the president, John Stevens, each
of the thirteen County delegations signed in the order of the age of
the Counties, from Bergen the oldest, to Sussex the youngest. At one
o’clock the same afternoon, the members of the convention went
in procession to the Court House where “in the Hearing of the
People,” the secretary, Samuel Witham Stockton, read the ratification
of the new Constitution by the Convention of New Jersey.
27 The reading was received with applause by the large
multitude which had gathered to witness the proceedings and thirteen
rounds, together with one more for the State of Delaware and another
for Pennsylvania, were fired by the militia who were present. New Jersey
was the third State to ratify the Constitution, being preceded by Delaware
on the seventh, and Pennsylvania on the twelfth of December. At the
conclusion of the ceremonies at the Court House, the delegates returned
in the same procession to the tavern in order “to complete the
great and important business of their appointment.” The following
morning, the convention was dissolved, after which the delegates with
the principal inhabitants of Trenton and its neighborhood dined at Mr.
Vandegrift’s tavern, “in which company the most perfect
harmony presided.” 28
27 Minutes
of the Convention of State of New Jersey,
December 18, 1787.
28 New
Jersey Journal and Political Intelligencer,
January 2, 1788.
III. Washington’s Reception
by the People of Trenton, 1789
ONE of the most pleasing celebrations ever held in
Trenton was the reception to Washington in 1789, when he passed through
the town en route to New York to be inaugurated the first President
of the United States. This event received considerable notice in the
press of the day, and has also been graphically and accurately presented
by the late William S. Stryker in his monograph entitled Washington’s
Reception by the People o f New Jersey in 1789, which was published
in 1882.
On the sixth day of April, 1789, Congress, then sitting
in New York, declared General Washington to have been elected the first
President of the United States. On the fourteenth of April, Mr. Charles
Thompson presented to him at Mount Vernon the official notice of his
election. Knowing well that the urgency of the public business required
the immediate attendance of the President at the seat of government,
Washington hastened his departure; and on the second day after receiving
notice of his appointment, he took leave of Mount Vernon.
MANY DEMONSTRATIONS OF AFFECTION
Although Washington looked forward
to a quiet journey from Mount Vernon to New York, he soon found that
it was impossible to prevent the demonstrations of affection which the
people of the towns along his route eagerly bestowed upon him. On the
twentieth of April he reached Philadelphia, where he was received with
great enthusiasm. The following morning, the military paraded at ten
o’clock to accompany Washington to Trenton, but “being obliged
on account of the weather to proceed in his carriage, he declined the
honor, for he could not, he said, think of riding under cover while
his friends were exposed to the rain on horseback.”
29
29 Griswold,
Republican Court, p. 128.
It was about two o’clock . . . when the carriage
arrived at the old stone ferry house at Colvin’s Ferry, now Morrisville.
Here Patrick Colvin, the owner of the ferry, took charge of the Presidential
party and personally ferried them over the Delaware river . . . . A
troop of horse, commanded by Captain Carle, and a company of infantry
commanded by Captain Hanlon, compleatly equipped, and in full uniform
with a large concourse of the gentlemen and inhabitants of the town
and neighborhood, lined the Jersey bank of the Delaware, to hail the
General’s arrival. As soon as he set foot on shore, he was welcomed
with three huzzas, which made the shores reecho the chearful sounds.
After being saluted .by the horse and infantry, he was escorted to town,
in the following order: A detachment of the horse. The Light Infantry.
His Excellency, on horseback, attended by Charles Thomson, Esquire,
and Colonel Humphreys. The troop of horse. The gentlemen of the town
and neighborhood on horseback. 30
30 Pennsylvania Packet,
May 1, 1789; Stryker, Washington’s Reception, p. 4.
While the gentlemen of the town were meeting “their
beloved General with peals of thunder” and honoring him “with
all the pompous parade of war,” it remained for the ladies of
Trenton to meet “their defender with sentiment and touch the tender
feelings of the Hero’s heart.” At the bridge over the Assunpink
Creek, the most prominent matrons of the town had planned a testimonial
“as new as it was pleasing,” in memory of General Washington’s
heroic deeds at the Battles of Trenton in 1776 and 1777, and as an expression
of their gratitude for the successful culmination of the Revolutionary
struggle.
On the north side of the bridge an arch about twenty feet high was
raised, supported on one side by seven and on the other by six pillars.
The arch was nearly twenty feet wide and about twelve feet in length.
Each of the thirteen pillars was entirely covered with masses of evergreens
and wreaths of laurel, and the arches above were closely twined about
with the same material, and festooned inside with long ropes of laurel
and the flowers of early spring. On the south side of the archway, the
side which first appeared to the presidential party, an inscription
in large gilt letters on a blue ground was fastened, and beautifully
ornamented with flowers:
THE DEFENDER OF THE MOTHERS WILL BE THE PROTECTOR OF THE DAUGHTERS.
Above this arch was a circlet of laurels and flowers, wreathing the
dates of those two events just referred to:
December 26, 1776 - January 2, 1777 31
The summit of the dome displayed a large sun-flower, which, always
pointing to the sun, was designed to express this sentiment, or motto,
“To you alone,” as emblematic of the affections and hopes
of the People being directed to him in the united suffrage of the millions
of America. 32
31 Stryker,
Washington’s Reception, p. 6.
32 Pennsylvania
Packet, May 1, 1789.
The framework of the arch had been
erected the previous day by workmen in charge of Benjamin Yard, but
it had been decorated by the ladies of Trenton with their own hands.
The weather had cleared during the
day, and as Washington came to the high ground on Mill Hill 33 the sun lit up the beautiful arch through which he
must pass. “But as he passed through the archway with uncovered
head a still more lovely sight greeted him. On the one side of the arch
he saw six little girls dressed in white, carrying baskets of flowers;
on the other side, thirteen young ladies to represent the several States,
who were dressed in similar style, and also had baskets filled with
flowers.” Behind them stood twenty-two of the most prominent matrons
of the town.
33 See
note 9, above.
As Washington rode beneath the arch,
the choir began to sing a beautiful ode, which had been written for
the occasion by Major Richard Howell, afterwards governor of New Jersey.
The song, which was rendered “with exquisite sweetness,”
was as follows:
34
Welcome, mighty Chief ! once more
Welcome to this grateful shore!
Now no mercenary foe
Aims again the fatal blow-
Aims at thee the fatal blow.
Virgins fair, and Matrons grave,
Those thy conquering arms did save,
Build for thee triumphal bowers.
Strew, ye fair, his way with flowers-
Strew your Hero’s way with flowers!
34 Stryker,
Washington’s Reception, p. 7.
Extensive research on the part of Dr. C. E. Godfrey
has established the fact that this sonata was sung to the tune of “See
the Conquering Hero Comes” from Handel’s “Judas Maccabaeus.”
35 According
to General Stryker, “The first four lines were sung by both matrons
and young ladies, the young ladies sang the fifth line, the matrons
the first part and the young ladies the last part of the sixth line,
then both sang the two next lines, the matrons the ninth, the young
ladies the tenth line.”
35 Trenton
Sunday Advertiser, December 29, 1912.
While the ode was being sung, General Washington
bared his head and listened “with deepest emotion.” In commenting
upon this occasion, Irving, in his life of Washington, says:
We question whether any of these testimonials of
a nation’s gratitude affected Washington more sensibly than those
he received at Trenton.
From information “obtained from one of the
participants in this reception who was living in the year 1850, from
one who died in 1864, and another in 1877, from others who remember
to have seen it, and from tradition in the families of Trenton,”
General Stryker has been able to identify all of the ladies of Trenton
and vicinity who took part in this reception.
The ladies who planned the celebration and who met
Washington at the bridge were Mrs. Susannah Armstrong, wife of Rev.
James F. Armstrong, Mrs. Mary Borden, Mrs. Susannah Calhoun, Mrs. Elizabeth
Chambers, Mrs. Esther Cox, Mrs. Mary Dickinson, Mrs. Elizabeth Ewing,
Mrs. Sarah Furman, Mrs. Susannah Gordon, Mrs. Mary Hanna, Mrs. Sarah
How, Mrs. Keziah B. Howell, Mrs. Mary Hunt, Mrs. Esther Lowrey, Mrs.
Sarah Milnor, Mrs. Ann Richmond, Mrs. Mary Smith, Mrs. Rachel Stevens,
Mrs. Annis Stockton, Mrs. Catherine Stockton, Mrs. Jane Tate and Mrs.
Grace Woodruff.
The thirteen young ladies who represented the several States were Miss
Eleanor Armstrong, Miss Elizabeth Borden, Miss Elizabeth Cadwalader,
Miss Catherine Calhoun, Miss Esther Cox, Miss Mary Cox, Miss Mary Dickinson,
Miss Maria Furman, Miss Mary C. Keen, Miss Mary Lowrey, Miss Maria Meredith,
Miss Sarah Moore and Miss Margaret Tate.
The six little girls who strewed flowers in front of Washington as
he passed under the arch were Sarah Airy, Jemina Broadhurst, Sarah Collins,
Sarah How, Sarah B. Howell and Elizabeth Milnor.
WASHINGTON'S
LETTER TO THE LADIES OF TRENTON
After the reception at the arch, General
Washington proceeded up Queen Street, now Broad, to the City Tavern,
formerly the French Arms, on the southwest corner of Second and King
Streets, where he dined with the principal citizens of the town. During
the afternoon, before he left for Princeton in the company of his friend,
the Rev. James Armstrong, pastor of the Presbyterian Church, a copy
of the song which had greeted him at the bridge was given to him, and
that evening he handed to Mr. Armstrong the following letter: 36
General Washington cannot leave this place without
expressing his acknowledgments, to the Matrons and Young Ladies who
received him in so novel and grateful a manner at the Triumphal Arch
in Trenton, for the exquisite sensation .he experienced in that affecting
moment. - The astonishing contrast between his former and actual situation
at the same spot, the elegant taste with which it was adorned for the
present occasion, and the innocent appearance of the white-robed choir
who met him with the gratulatory song, have made such impressions on
his remembrance as, he assures them, will never be effaced.
Trenton April 21st, 1789
36 Stryker,
Washington’s Reception, p. 19.
This letter was read the following
afternoon at a gathering of ladies at the home of Dr. Isaac Smith on
King Street, and was later printed and a copy distributed to each lady
who aided in the reception. The original note was preserved in the family
of Dr. Smith, and later was presented to Chief Justice Ewing by Miss
Lydia Imlay, an adopted daughter of Judge Smith. Judge Ewing placed
the letter “in a handsome frame” and for many years it was
“preserved by his family as a most gracious relic.” In 1927,
the letter was placed in the permanent custody of the Free Public Library
by William E. and Caleb S. Green.
The arch was preserved on the premises
of the Misses Barnes on King Street, near the Episcopal Church, until
1824, when it was placed in front of the State House to grace the reception
to General Lafayette. A portion of it was again used on May 10, 1855,
on Chancery Lane, upon the occasion of a firemen’s parade given
in honor of a visit of the Phoenix Hose Company, of Easton, Pa. Later
it came into possession of Mrs. Armstrong and Dr. Francis Ewing. In
1876, it was exhibited at the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia,
and later deposited in Independence Hall, where it remained until 1897,
when it was returned to Trenton and placed in the Battle Monument. Recently
it was transferred to the Old Barracks, where it now occupies a place
of honor on the wall of the armor room.
37
37 Podmore,
“Washington Arch,” Trenton, February 1928.
About a month after the reception to
General Washington, on May 25, 1789, Mrs. Washington, with her grandchildren,
Eleanor Custis and George Washington Custis, spent a night in Trenton,
while en route to New York to join her husband. The following year,
on September 1, 1790, Washington and his family stayed over night at
the City Tavern, while travelling from New York to the southward. “Beside
the President and Mrs. Washington, the travelling party comprised .
. . the two grandchildren of Mrs. Washington, Major William Jackson,
Thomas Nelson, two maids, four white and four black servants and sixteen
horses.”38
38 Baker,
Itinerary of Washington, Vol. 11, p. 194.
IV. Trenton Made the Capital of
New Jersey, 1790
ALTHOUGH Trenton was unsuccessful in
its attempts to become the federal capital of the United States, it
was honored by being selected, in 1790, as the capital of the State
of New Jersey. As early as September, 1776, Governor Livingston, in
his message to the House, had recommended that the capital of the State
of New Jersey be located “in some convenient and plentiful part
of the State,” but in spite of the suggestion no definite action
was taken. During the Revolution, the Assembly and Council met at such
places as convenience and safety required, occasionally visiting Perth
Amboy, the old capital of East Jersey, and Burlington, the old capital
of West Jersey. With the establishment of peace, interest in the subject
was revived, due partly to the presence of Congress in Trenton and partly
to the efforts of Trenton to become the seat of the federal government.
As in the case of the location of the federal capital,
the North and the South were on opposite sides of the question. A conservative
spirit desired the retention of both Burlington and Perth Amboy, while
other members were equally active on behalf of Woodbury and New Brunswick.
The convenience of Trenton’s location on the route of the “flying
machines,” as the stage coaches which ran between New York and
Philadelphia were modestly called, finally outweighed all other considerations,
and on November 25, 1790, “An Act for fixing a permanent seat
of government in this State” was enacted, providing:
That Trenton, in the county of Hunterdon, shall
henceforth be considered as the seat of government; and that the first
meeting of the Legislature, after the next, and every further annual
election for the members thereof, shall be at Trenton, in the County
of Hunterdon. 39
39 Laws
of the State of New Jersey, November 25, 1790.
The following year, “An Act to
provide suitable buildings for the accommodation of the Legislature
and public offices of the State” was introduced and finally passed
November 22, 1791, in spite of renewed efforts to have New Brunswick
and Woodbury inserted in place of Trenton. In pursuance of the Act,
Joseph Cooper, Thomas Lowery, James Ewing, Maskell Ewing, George Anderson,
James Mott and Moore Furman were appointed commissioners with power
to purchase or accept a suitable tract of land for the erection of buildings
for the use of the State. The tract secured was located where the present
Capitol building now stands and consisted of three and three-quarters
acres, purchased from Joseph Britain, George Ely and Mrs. Mary McCall
at a cost of £250 5s. The erection of the State House was immediately
begun and by 1794 the Legislature was able to hold its sessions there.
The total cost of the building was £3,000, which was raised by
State appropriation, by a subscription of £300 from the inhabitants
of Trenton and by the sale of articles belonging to New Jersey. 40
40 True
American, June 25, 1897.
THE ORIGINAL
STATE HOUSE
The original State House was a quaint-looking building,
sixty by one hundred feet, with a bow at either end containing rooms
for the Assembly and for the Council. It was rough-cast, of a bluish
color, and had a cupola which, in 1806, was provided with a bell which
was used for announcing the hour of meeting of both Houses and occasionally
for giving an alarm of fire in the town.
By an Act of the Legislature, passed March 3, 1795,
a building was erected for the quarters of the secretary of state and
for the preservation of the public records. About this time, Second
Street, now State Street, was extended westward a short distance and
a gravel walk laid from Chambers corner, now State and Willow, to the
Capitol building. In 1798, the lot was enclosed with a fence, and, in
1799, a brick pavement was laid around the building.
|
|
At first, the use of the State House
appears to have been permitted for other purposes than for the accommodation
of the Legislature and State officials, but on November 3, 1803, it
was resolved by the General Assembly “that a committee be appointed
to inquire into the cause and conduct of a mob assembled in Trenton
in the month of February last, and also by whose direction or approbation
the State House was occupied as a ball room on the 4th of July.”
This inquiry led to the appointment of a custodian of the State House
and also to the decision that the building was not “to be occupied
for any other purpose than for the accommodation of the constituted
authorities for which it was erected.”
41
41 Votes
and Proceedings of General Assembly of New Jersey,
November 3, 10, 1803.
Numerous repairs were made to the State House from
time to time, and some attempt was made to beautify the grounds around
the building. Several small office buildings were erected adjoining
the main building, and in 1848 very extensive additions were made to
it. At that time, the rough-casting was removed and a rotunda was added.
After the erection of the State House, it was thought
desirable to have a permanent residence for the executive of the State,
and consequently on the ninth of March, 1798, the Legislature passed
an Act appointing James Mott and John Beatty commissioners to contract
for and purchase a house and lot of land for the residence of the governor.
A sum of $10,000 was appropriated for this purpose and on March 12,
1798, the commissioners purchased a house and lot from Moore Furman,
located on Second Street, a block or so east of the Capitol. A letter
of Moore Furman’s, dated April 4, 1798, shows that the house was
occupied by the governor the following month:
42
Trenton April 4th 1798.
Dear Sir,
. . . I have sold my house for $10,000 and conveyed it to our present
Governour [Richard Howell] and to his successors forever . . . . I am
moving in the Storm to a new house, a few doors to the westward of the
house I sold, and . . . the Governour is fixing himself and family in
the Government house.
42 Letters
of Moore Furman, pp. 108-9.
Most of the subsequent governors, however, appear
to have preferred to live in their own homes and rent the house provided
for them. Consequently, whenever the question of repairs to the house
came before the Legislature, a commission was appointed to inquire into
and report the propriety of selling the same. On November 12, 1801,
a committee of both Houses of the Legislature reported:
That convinced of the propriety of having the governor
as well as the heads of departments to reside at the seat of government,
the convenience which will necessarily result to persons having business
in chancery, the immediate access which the executive at all times have,
and the frequent necessity of recurring to the public documents, are
of such importance, and we trust so obvious, that the Legislature will
at all times, hold out the inducement of a good and convenient house
for the immediate accommodation of the governor .... For the above reasons
it is the opinion of your committee it would be inexpedient to sell
the same at present. 42a
42a Journal
of the Proceedings of the Legislative Council of State of New Jersey,
November 12, 1801.
In spite of this and similar reports,
other attempts were made to sell the house, and in 1824 commissioners
were appointed to sell part of the government lot, commencing on the
southwest corner and extending twenty feet to the east, the money received
from the sale to be applied to the school fund.
On March 1, 1830, a resolution was
adopted, that in case the governor saw fit to make the government house
his residence, the treasurer should be authorized to put it in proper
repair, and in February 1833 two commissioners were appointed to repair
the dwelling-house, carriage-house, and fences, at a cost not exceeding
$300.
The house was finally sold, in 1845, to John A. Weart,
Joseph C. Potts and Dr. John McKelway for the sum of $10,000. About
1862, the house was considerably enlarged and reopened as the State
Street House. In 1903, the house was thoroughly remodelled and refurnished
throughout, and on January 1, 1904, it was reopened as the Hotel Sterling,
which name it still bears. The part of the building that abuts State
Street is the original governor’s mansion, the governor’s
reception and sitting-room now serving as the hotel office.
V. Lafayette’s Three Visits
to Trenton
THE most distinguished visitor received by the Continental
Congress while in session in Trenton in 1784 was General Lafayette,
who on the sixth of December wrote to President Lee that he would wait
upon Congress the Friday following, and in taking leave of that body
would be “happy to receive what Commands they may please to lay
upon one of their Most Affectionate and devoted servants.”
43
On the ninth of December, the matter was referred to a congressional
committee, consisting of Messrs. Jay, Williamson and Hardy, which immediately
reported that “the merit and services of the Marquis renders it
proper that such an opportunity of taking leave of Congress be afforded
him.” A special committee, consisting of one member from each
State, was then appointed “to receive the Marquis and in the name
of Congress to take leave of him,” and also to prepare a letter
commending him to the favor and patronage of his Most Christian Majesty,
the King of France. 44
43 Papers,
Continental Congress, No. 19, Vol. II, p.
253.
44 Journals
of Congress, December 9, 1784.
THE FIRST VISIT
On Friday afternoon, December 10, General
Lafayette arrived in Trenton and on the following day, immediately after
the close of the congressional session, was formally received by John
Jay, chairman of the special committee, and his fellow-members, in the
Long Room of the French Arms tavern. The resolution of the ninth of
December assuring him “that Congress continued to entertain the
same high sense of his abilities and zeal to promote the welfare of
America, both here and in Europe, which they had frequently expressed
and manifested on former occasions,” and that they would not “cease
to feel an interest in whatever may concern his honor and prosperity”
was then communicated to him.
Lafayette then replied to Congress in the following terms:
45
Sir:
While it pleases the United States in Congress so kindly to receive
me, I want words to express the feelings of a heart which delights in
their present situation and the bestowed marks of their esteem.
Since I joined the standard of liberty, to this wished for hour of
my personal congratulations, I have seen such glorious deeds performed,
and virtues displayed by the sons of America, that in the instant of
my first concern for them, I had anticipated but a part of the love
and regard which devote me to this rising empire.
During our revolution, sir, I obtained an unlimited indulgent confidence,
which I am equally proud and happy to acknowledge; it dates with the
time, when an unexperienced youth, I could only claim my respected friends
paternal adoption. It has been most benevolently continued throughout
every circumstance of the cabinet and the field; and in personal friendships,
I often found a support against public difficulties. While, on this
solemn occasion I mention my obligations to Congress, the State, the
people at large, permit me also to remember the dear military companions,
to whose services their country is so much indebted.
Having felt both for the timely aid of my country and for the part
she, with a beloved king, acted in the cause of mankind, I enjoy an
alliance so well rivetted by mutual affection, by interest, and even
local situation. Recollection insures it. Futurity does but enlarge
the prospect; and the private intercourse will every day increase, which
independent and advantageous trade cherishes, in proportion as it is
well understood.
In unbounded wishes to America, sir, I am happy to observe the prevailing
disposition of the people to strengthen the confederation, preserve
public faith, regulate trade, and in a proper guard over continental
magazines and frontier posts, in a general system of militia, in foreseeing
attention to the navy, to insure every kind of safety. May this immense
temple of freedom ever stand a lesson to oppressors, an example to the
oppressed, a sanctuary for the rights of mankind! and may these happy
United States attain that compleat splendor and prosperity which will
illustrate the blessing of their government, and for ages to come rejoice
the departed souls of its founders.
However unwilling to trespass on your time, I must yet present you
with grateful thanks for the late favors of Congress, and never can
they oblige me so much as when they put it in my power, in every part
of the world, to the latest day of my life, to gratify the attachment
which will ever rank me among the most zealous and respectful servants
of the United States.
LAFAYETTE.
45 ibid.,
December 13, 1784.
At the conclusion of the formal ceremonies, President
Lee handed to General Lafayette an autograph letter containing his personal
congratulations and farewell, together with a sealed envelope, which
he requested the Marquis to deliver personally to the Hon. Benjamin
Franklin, Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States to France. 46 This packet also contained the congressional letter to the French
King commending the Marquis to his royal favor in recognition of the
invaluable services which he had rendered to this country during the
Revolution.
46 Papers,
Continental Congress, No. 16, p. 315.
On the same day that Lafayette was
received by Congress, he was also received by the Legislature of New
Jersey, then sitting in Trenton. An address was presented to him by
order of the Council and House, expressing “fervent wishes”
for his welfare and prosperity, and assuring him that “the citizens
of New Jersey will ever retain an excellent sense of your disinterested
friendship and important services.” To which the Marquis replied
that his heart felt “deeply interested in the warmest wishes for
the particular welfare of the State of New Jersey,” and that he
wished to present them “with the most grateful acknowledgements
and affectionate assurances” of his respect. 47 The following
Monday morning, Lafayette left Trenton for Elizabeth-town and New York,
and on Thursday, December 15, he sailed on La Nymphe for France.
47 New
Jersey Gazette, December 27, 1784.
LAFAYETTE RETURNS
IN 1824
In 1824, Lafayette returned to the
United States for his fourth and farewell visit. As soon as it was known
that he would visit Trenton, preparations were begun for his reception.
On August 17, 1824, the citizens of Trenton assembled at the City Tavern,
formerly the French Arms, and passed resolutions providing ways and
means for the entertainment of the General and his party, which comprised
his son, George Washington Lafayette, and his secretary, Auguste Le
Masseur. At this meeting, it was “Resolved, That Charles Ewing,
Pearson Hunt and William Halstead, junior, esquires, be a committee
of the citizens to cooperate with the committee appointed by the Corporation
to make and carry into effect the arrangements required by this interesting
occasion.”
The committee of the Corporation, which
had been appointed the previous day, consisted of Evan Evans, David
Johnston and Charles Burroughs. 48
These two committees entered upon their work with great enthusiasm,
so that by the time of Lafayette’s arrival on the twenty-fifth
of September everything was in readiness for his reception and the whole
city in holiday attire. An account of the celebration in the True
American for September 25, 1824, shows the excitement prevailing
in the city: “In this city, ordinary business is suspended, the
common affairs of life are forgotten, and one general feeling of enthusiasm
prevails in favor of La Fayette . . . . We can say no more but run to
mingle with the enraptured multitude.”
48 Trenton
Federalist, August 23, 1824.
General Doughty had been selected by Governor Williamson
to command the escort that met Lafayette at the State border and conducted
him across the State. A medal, bearing on one side the likeness of Washington
and on the other that of Lafayette, was issued by the State and worn
by those who participated in the march.
On the twenty-fifth of September “the
Committee of Arrangement from Trenton, with a corps of cavalry, met
the General [at Princeton] to conduct him to Trenton. He was accompanied
by the Governor and suite, and followed by a train of Citizens on horseback
and in carriages. The General rode in an open Barouch, drawn by four
white horses.” The parade ground on the Brunswick Road was reached
about two o’clock, and there the military of Hunterdon, Somerset,
Burlington and Gloucester, consisting of about 2,000 men, were reviewed
by the famous General. Immediately afterwards, a procession was formed
in the following order - Cavalry, infantry, marshal, committee of the
citizens, Governor Williamson and his suite, marshal, General Lafayette
and his companions, officers of the Army and Navy, visitors of distinction,
clergy, members of the bar, physicians, societies, citizens, marshal.
The “arrival of the Procession at the head of Warren Street was
announced by the firing of cannon and the ringing of bells. The bells
continued to ring until the procession arrived at the State House.”
At the head of Warren Street the procession
passed under an elevated arch, “irradiated with stars and bearing
the name of Lafayette stretched across the street. Its whole upper surface
was mantled with verdure and beneath its curvature, the whole width
of the intercolumniation was beautifully festooned with intertwisted
wreaths of flowers and laurel. From its central summit, as also from
the lateral arches on the right and left, sprang each a living cedar,
their greenness studded over with flowers of various hues.”
The procession moved down Warren Street,
passing under another decorated arch that stood near the corner of Warren
and State Streets, to Bloomsbury Street (now South Warren), thence through
Market Street to Greene Street (now Broad), up Greene Street to Perry
Street, down Perry to Warren, down Warren to State, and up State to
the State House. The streets were thronged with spectators from all
parts of the adjacent country, and “there was one universal burst
of feeling throughout the city.” A Philadelphia newspaper of the
period notes that “such was the immense crowd that mail from Philadelphia
had to pass around the city and enter the east street and the carrier
had to lug the bag on his head and shoulders a distance of about 200
yards.”
THE WASHINGTON
ARCH USED ONCE MORE
As Lafayette stepped from his barouche
in front of the State House and advanced through an aisle formed by
the military and the citizens, he was greeted by a sight of the Washington
arch which had been erected at the gateway to the Capitol. At the arch,
he was met by a group of twenty-four young women, representing the States
of the Union, each bearing the name of the State she represented on
a white belt which encircled her waist. As Lafayette advanced under
the arch, thirteen members of the group, each representing one of the
thirteen original Colonies, stepped forward and sang the following lines:
A welcome gallant chief
From Gaill’as sunny clime,
To glad our grateful hearts
Still spared by heaven and time,
Ten million voices raise
Their grateful notes today
Accept our feeble lays‑
All we can pay.
The spirit of our sires
Still burns as free and bright
As burned its vestal fires
In the battle’s stormy night,
It taught us to be free,
And ne’er will we forget
It bade us honor thee
Love La-Fayette.
Lafayette listened closely to the “dulcet notes
of this interesting choir” and when the song was ended, replied:
“Young ladies, I thank you very much.” Later, upon being
introduced to the young ladies of the choir, he remarked that he had
never seen the States so handsomely represented.
The General was next escorted into
the Assembly Room, which had been converted into a bower of beauty for
the occasion. Here Lafayette was received by the mayor of Trenton, Robert
McNeely, and Common Council, convened for the purpose of welcoming the
distinguished visitor. The exercises were opened by an address of welcome
by the mayor, expressing the joy it afforded the citizens of Trenton
to receive Lafayette as their guest. The General returned a “feeling
and appropriate answer,” and after receiving a number of the citizens
of the town, was conducted with great pomp to the Trenton House, on
North Warren Street, where lodgings had been provided for him, and where
a sumptuous banquet was served to a distinguished gathering of about
one hundred guests.
In the evening, Lafayette attended
a “handsome Entertainment ordered by the New Jersey Society of
Cincinnati at the City Tavern.” Most of the night was spent there
in conversation with his brother officers of the Revolutionary Army.
Trenton was all aglow and the arches were illuminated with lanterns.
The next morning being Sunday, General
Lafayette attended service at the Presbyterian Church. Upon his entrance,
the congregation rose in a body, and remained standing until he took
his seat in the mayor’s pew. At the close of the services, Lafayette
was the guest of Mayor McNeely at his home on North Warren Street. In
the afternoon, Lafayette rode to Bordentown, to visit Joseph Bonaparte,
but returned to his apartments in the Trenton House the same evening.
The following morning, under military escort and accompanied by the
governor and a number of prominent citizens, he left Trenton for Philadelphia. 49
49 The full account of this celebration,
from which the above quotations have been taken, may be found in the
Trenton Federalist of September 27, 1824, and in the True American for
October 2, 1824.
LAFAYETTE 'S THIRD VISIT TO TRENTON
The third and last visit of Lafayette
to Trenton was on Saturday, July 16, 1825, when he breakfasted at the
City Tavern, before proceeding to the home of Joseph Bonaparte at Bordentown,
whence he went to Philadelphia. 50
It was at this time that he presented to Joseph Justice, of Trenton,
the stamp which he had used to frank his correspondence during his visit
to the United States in 1824, a privilege which had been granted him
by special Act of Congress. Mr. Justice was then postmaster of Trenton,
and editor of the True American, and had been a member of the
reception committee at the time of Lafayette’s visit of the previous
year. 51
50 Trenton
Federalist, July 18, 1825.
51 Heston,
Jersey Waggon Jaunts, Vol. II, p. 217. There is a facsimile of
this stamp in the Trentoniana collection of the Free Public Library.
VI. Other Interesting Celebrations
and Distinguished Visitors
THE citizens of Trenton were very active in the matter
of celebrations in these early days and the newspapers of the period
contain detailed descriptions of many of these festive occasions. On
October 27, 1781, the capture of Cornwallis at Yorktown was celebrated
by the inhabitants of Trenton “with every mark of joy and festivity.”
The day was ushered in with the beating of drums, and at eleven o’clock
the governor, Council and Assembly attended a service at the Presbyterian
Church conducted by the Rev. Elihu Spencer. In the evening the town
was brilliantly illuminated.
The following year an event of state
and national importance occurred at the French Arms tavern in celebration
of the birth of a Dauphin and heir to the Crown of France. The birth
was formally announced to Congress on May 2, 1782, and by Congress to
the governors of the States. It was celebrated in Trenton May 24, 1782,
when the “town artillery paraded at the market-place” and
a dinner was attended by the officers of the State at the French Arms.
The New Jersey Gazette for May 29, 1782, comments upon “the
joy and satisfaction manifested on this occasion” and adds that
“the liberal principles of the alliance, the generous aids offered
to these States in consequence of it, and the great end it has been
instrumental in securing, must ever interest us in the happiness of
a nation whose character and conduct is the laudable reverse of that
of our enemies.” It was in connection with this celebration that
the first American flag definitely known to have been hoisted in Trenton
was unfurled to the breeze from the French Arms tavern.
A year later, on April 15, 1783, the
citizens of Trenton held a gala celebration incident to the ratification
of the “glorious peace” lately concluded with Great Britain
at Versailles. About eleven o’clock in the morning, His Excellency
Governor Livingston, the vice-president of the State, members of the
Legislature, judges of the Supreme Court and other public officials,
together “with a great number of the inhabitants of the town and
vicinity,” including the trustees, teachers and students of the
Academy, met at the tavern of Rensselaer Williams on upper King Street,
and from there went in procession to the Court House, where the governor’s
proclamation, declaring a cessation of hostilities in pursuance of the
proclamation of Congress of April 11 was read, after which thirteen
cannon were fired, succeeded by the cheers of the people. At noon divine
service was attended, the discourse being delivered by Dr. Elihu Spencer,
pastor of the Presbyterian Church. At three o’clock entertainments
were held in the French Arms, the Blazing Star 52 and Royal
Oak taverns in King Street, where numerous toasts were drunk. At seven
o’clock the houses of the town were illuminated, and the festivities
of the day closed with a ball given in the French Arms.
52 This
tavern was located on North King Street and was kept by Francis Witt.
When he leased the French Arms, on the southwest corner of King and
Second Streets, in January 1785, he transferred the name Blazing,Star
to that tavern. The former Blazing .Star tavern was later known as the
Indian King.
In striking contrast to these festive occasions was
the public commemoration of Washington’s death which was observed
by the town on the fourteenth of January, 1800, just one month after
his death at Mount Vernon. In the morning, an oration was delivered
by Samuel Stanhope Smith, President of the College of New Jersey, in
St. Michael’s Episcopal Church, of which the Rev. Henry Waddell
was rector, and at half-past ten a procession was formed in Warren Street,
opposite the church. As the bier, on which was deposited the General’s
hat, gloves and sword, was brought out of the church, preceded by the
clergy and followed by the mayor and Common Council in deep black, it
was received by the assembled troops with presented arms. Accompanied
by the tolling of the bells, the procession moved off to the State House,
where the ceremonies were performed. At a certain stanza in one of the
elegiac songs, “eight beautiful girls, of about ten years of age,
dressed in white robes and black sashes, with baskets on their arms
filled with sprigs of cypress, rose from behind the speaker’s
seat” and strewed the cypress on the mock coffin. 53
53 Hall,
History of the Presbyterian Church in Trenton, pp. 206-7.
DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
OF THE LATE EIGHTEENTH AND EARLY NINETEENTH CENTURIES
A number of distinguished visitors
passed through Trenton during the early years of the nineteenth century
and practically all of them, with the exception of Thomas Paine, were
warmly received and entertained. The latter rode up to Trenton from
Bordentown, February 28, 1803, to take the stage for New York. Refused
a seat in the stage; he set out in his own chaise, but “a mob
surrounded him with insulting music and he had difficulty in getting
out of the town.” The author of those ringing lines, “These
are the times that try men’s souls,” showed neither fear
nor anger, and “calmly observed that such conduct had no tendency
to hurt his feelings or injure his fame, but rather gratified the one
and contributed to the other.”54
54 idem.,
p. 210.
Early in November 1798 General Charles Cotesworth
Pinckney, Ambassador to France, visited Trenton and was tendered a reception
at the City Hotel, on north King Street, which was attended by the mayor,
other city officers and heads of the government departments, and on
January 18, 1806, a public dinner was given to Captain (afterward Commodore)
Bainbridge, upon his return from Barbary. President Monroe, who was
wounded in the Battle of Trenton, arrived in the city on Saturday, June
7, 1817, and the following morning attended service at the Presbyterian
Church. On November 27, 1824, De Witt Clinton, governor-elect of the
State of New York, who was in Trenton to demonstrate the practicability
and utility of the proposed Morris Canal, was presented with an address
by the vice-president of the Council, and later entertained at the City
Tavern by a large number of the members of the New Jersey Legislature.
In 1799,
55 Trenton had the honor of becoming the seat of the federal government
for a few weeks, while President Adams and his Cabinet were meeting
in the city. Due to the prevalence of yellow fever in Philadelphia the
public offices of the government were removed to this city on the twenty-sixth
of August, and on the twenty-ninth, Benjamin Stoddert, Secretary of
the Navy, wrote to President John Adams, who had already gone to Quincy,
Mass., to escape the epidemic, that “the offices are now at this
place and not badly accommodated” and urged the President to come
to Trenton before the departure of the envoys to the French Republic.
55 Accounts
differ as to just when the public offices were removed to Trenton. Raum,
in his History of Trenton, says that “in September 1793
the yellow fever made its appearance in Philadelphia and as a precautionary
means to prevent the fever spreading among the inhabitants should it
make its appearance here, the Common Council of the city appointed Messrs.
Axford and Howell a committee to procure a house for travellers and
for poor persons who might be taken ill of that malignant fever. The
public offices of the United States government were removed here during
the prevalence of the fever in 1793.” The History of Philadelphia,
by Scharf and Westcott, states that in 1797 “the office of Secretary
of State was opened at Trenton, New Jersey, and the heads of the State
and Post-Office departments went to the same town,” while other
histories refer to the removal of the offices to Trenton in 1798. As
the yellow fever was prevalent in Philadelphia during all these years,
it is probable that the offices were removed here upon several different
occasions. From a study of the letters of President Adams, we conclude
that he did not come to Trenton until 1799.
The President was most reluctant to come to Trenton,
however, and replied to Stoddert that for him “to spend two or
three months at Trenton with unknown accommodations cannot be very agreeable.
Alone, and in private, I can put up with anything; but in my public
station, you know I cannot.”
In spite of Adams’ reluctance,
the members of his Cabinet, who were opposed to the French mission,
continued to urge the desirability of his presence in Trenton, and on
the second of September the President wrote to Stoddert that he would
be at Trenton by the tenth or twelfth of October but that Mrs. Adams
would not accompany him. Regarding accommodations he wrote:
I can and will put up, with my private secretary
and two domestics only, at the first tavern or first private house I
can find.
President Adams arrived in Trenton
on the tenth of October, and the next day was greeted with fireworks.
He found “the inhabitants of Trenton wrought up to a pitch of
political enthusiasm that surprised him” in the expectation that
Louis XVIII would soon be restored to the throne of France.
All of the Cabinet members were in
Trenton, with the exception of the Attorney-General, who was in Virginia,
and for six days, from October 10 to 15 inclusive, the President was
employed in conference with them, either at his own apartments in the
Phoenix Hotel, which stood on Warren Street where West Hanover now joins
Warren, or at their respective offices. An agreement on the French mission
was finally reached and, on the fifth of November, the commissioners
sailed for France. By the middle of November it was considered safe
to return to Philadelphia and the offices were removed there. 56
56 Works
of John Adams, Vol. IX, pp. 18, 19, 33, 252-3.
SOME CONTEMPORARY
DESCRIPTIONS OF THE CITY
From the writings and journals of the
travellers who passed through Trenton in these early days it is possible
to get some idea of the appearance of the town. Trenton had been incorporated
as a city in 1792 and, being on the stage route between New York and
Philadelphia, had developed into quite a thriving place. The celebrated
French naturalist, Francois Michaux, who passed through Trenton in 1802,
says that “among the other small towns by the road side, Trenton
seemed worthy of attention. Its situation upon the Delaware, the beautiful
tract of country that surrounds it, must render it a most delightful
place of abode.” The beautiful surroundings of the town impressed
more than one traveller, and James Flint, in his Letters from America
in 1818, notes that “Trenton is beautifully situated at the head
of the tide-water of the river Delaware. The orchards are luxuriant
and the pasture grounds richer than any that I have hitherto seen in
the country.”
As most of these travellers spent only
one night in Trenton, their comments are largely confined to the general
appearance of the town and the condition of the taverns, which were
“much dearer on this road than in Massachusetts and Connecticut.”
An English tourist, Henry Wansey, writing
in 1794, says of the town: “The houses join each other and form
regular streets, very much like some of the small towns in Devonshire.
The town has a very good market, which is well supplied with butcher’s
meat, fish and poultry. Many good shops are to be seen there, in general
with seats on each side of the entrance, and a step or two up into each
house.” Isaac Weld, Jr., a native of Ireland, who passed through
Trenton in July, 1796, writes that “the streets are commodious,
and the houses neatly built.”
The Duke de la Rochefoucauld, writing
in 1797, says that the houses of the town were mostly wooden, those
on the high street being best, “but very modest in appearance.”
He comments, however, upon the “number of handsome villas which
greatly enrich the landscape” in the environs of the town.
In 1825 the Duke of Saxe-Weimar describes
Trenton as a “very handsome place,” with a “remarkable
bridge crossing the Delaware.” This bridge was begun in 1804 and
on January 30, 1806, the completion of the span was celebrated with
appropriate ceremonies. Gordon, in his Gazetteer of New Jersey,
describes it as “a span of 1100 feet, having a double carriageway
and footpaths resting on the chords of, and suspended from, a series
of five arches, supported on stone piers. This structure has been much
admired for its lightness, grace, and strength.”
In 1834, according to Gordon’s
Gazetteer, Trenton proper contained:
425 dwellings, 13 taverns, about 30 stores, among
which are 3 bookstores, and 3 silversmith shops; 3 printing offices
. . . a public library . . . and a lyceum or literary association .
. . . The Philadelphia steam-boats ply daily, and sometimes several
times a day, one from Lamberton, and others from Bloomsbury;
57 and stages run 3 times a day by the rail-road to New
York and Philadelphia.
57 See
note 9, above.
Gordon adds that “for some years past Trenton
has not been in a very thriving state, but the late improvements have
given new life to business and enterprise, and much prosperity is anticipated.”
©
1929, TRENTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY |